This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wikipedia is not the place to publish this document. If it has been published somewhere else, feel free to reference that source and incorporate some of the information contained with in. Clerks. ( talk) 16:04, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
This article only views the GRAND Canal proposal as a good thing, not mentioning the potential environmental and social destruction of such a grande scheme. FUNgus guy ( talk) 16:59, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Also, I don't think that the acronym GRAND needs to be in the title. "Great Recycling and Northern Development Canal" is more than enough. FUNgus guy ( talk) 17:05, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
No consensus to move. Vegaswikian ( talk) 23:01, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Great Recycling and Northern Development Canal → Great Recycling and Northern Development (GRAND) Canal — This project has been most commonly known as the GRAND Canal for fifty years. Having the word GRAND in the title make this article accessible to individuals searching for it on the internet using it's most commonly known name i.e. "GRAND Canal". The current Great Recycling and Northern Development (GRAND) Canal page has no content.It would be helpful if there was a re-direct from the new Great Recycling and Northern Development Canal page to the new Great Recycling and Northern Development (GRAND) Canal page Mkierans ( talk) 09:03, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
As I stated above, this project has been commonly know as the GRAND Canal for more than fifty years. My problem is that when I search Google for "GRAND Canal" this Article does not appear: at least not in the first ten pages of the search results. A lot of other Grand Canals appear but not this one. You may justifiably feel that the title is too long and cumbersome but this is the title that the author of the project decided to give to it and I think this decision should be respected. Moreover, I don't think that it is a good idea for Wikipedia to be changing the names of projects just because they don't comply with the the editors penchant for brevity. I moved Great Recycling and Northern Development (GRAND) Canal to Great Recycling and Northern Development (GRAND) Canal2 because when I tried to rename Great Recycling and Northern Development Canal using the method provided on the page I got a message that I could not do so because Great Recycling and Northern Development (GRAND) Canal already exits. I thought (mistakenly) that I could avoid this rejection of the renaming by renaming Great Recycling and Northern Development (GRAND) Canal first. Mkierans ( talk) 20:20, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
CLARIFICATION REQUIRED: So is this article going to be moved/renamed to "Great Recycling and Northern Development (GRAND) Canal" so that people searching it under the name it has been referred to over the last fifty yeears can find it or not? If so, when? If not, can I appeal and how? Mkierans ( talk) 21:13, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
An image used in this article, File:GCNArecyling solution1.gif, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 03:07, 26 November 2011 (UTC) |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Great Recycling and Northern Development Canal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:35, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wikipedia is not the place to publish this document. If it has been published somewhere else, feel free to reference that source and incorporate some of the information contained with in. Clerks. ( talk) 16:04, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
This article only views the GRAND Canal proposal as a good thing, not mentioning the potential environmental and social destruction of such a grande scheme. FUNgus guy ( talk) 16:59, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Also, I don't think that the acronym GRAND needs to be in the title. "Great Recycling and Northern Development Canal" is more than enough. FUNgus guy ( talk) 17:05, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
No consensus to move. Vegaswikian ( talk) 23:01, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Great Recycling and Northern Development Canal → Great Recycling and Northern Development (GRAND) Canal — This project has been most commonly known as the GRAND Canal for fifty years. Having the word GRAND in the title make this article accessible to individuals searching for it on the internet using it's most commonly known name i.e. "GRAND Canal". The current Great Recycling and Northern Development (GRAND) Canal page has no content.It would be helpful if there was a re-direct from the new Great Recycling and Northern Development Canal page to the new Great Recycling and Northern Development (GRAND) Canal page Mkierans ( talk) 09:03, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
As I stated above, this project has been commonly know as the GRAND Canal for more than fifty years. My problem is that when I search Google for "GRAND Canal" this Article does not appear: at least not in the first ten pages of the search results. A lot of other Grand Canals appear but not this one. You may justifiably feel that the title is too long and cumbersome but this is the title that the author of the project decided to give to it and I think this decision should be respected. Moreover, I don't think that it is a good idea for Wikipedia to be changing the names of projects just because they don't comply with the the editors penchant for brevity. I moved Great Recycling and Northern Development (GRAND) Canal to Great Recycling and Northern Development (GRAND) Canal2 because when I tried to rename Great Recycling and Northern Development Canal using the method provided on the page I got a message that I could not do so because Great Recycling and Northern Development (GRAND) Canal already exits. I thought (mistakenly) that I could avoid this rejection of the renaming by renaming Great Recycling and Northern Development (GRAND) Canal first. Mkierans ( talk) 20:20, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
CLARIFICATION REQUIRED: So is this article going to be moved/renamed to "Great Recycling and Northern Development (GRAND) Canal" so that people searching it under the name it has been referred to over the last fifty yeears can find it or not? If so, when? If not, can I appeal and how? Mkierans ( talk) 21:13, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
An image used in this article, File:GCNArecyling solution1.gif, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 03:07, 26 November 2011 (UTC) |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Great Recycling and Northern Development Canal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:35, 24 March 2017 (UTC)