![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 6 August 2015. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Pretty sure McGladrey is the fifth largest national accounting firm and Grant is 6th
Does Anyone think that we should try to expand this article? At least put the logo on it. My father workd for Grant Thornton so I would be able to acess their official policy very easily.
The Heron 13:30, 23 February 2007 (UTC)The Heron
For an article on a Major company this article has a complete lack of Independent Wikipedia:references. At least it not write with the the usual PR prose of a lot of corporate articles, but has loads of material that could be taken as unsubstantiated claims and deleted. - BulldozerD11 ( talk) 12:33, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Grant Thornton LLP. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:36, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 6 August 2015. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Pretty sure McGladrey is the fifth largest national accounting firm and Grant is 6th
Does Anyone think that we should try to expand this article? At least put the logo on it. My father workd for Grant Thornton so I would be able to acess their official policy very easily.
The Heron 13:30, 23 February 2007 (UTC)The Heron
For an article on a Major company this article has a complete lack of Independent Wikipedia:references. At least it not write with the the usual PR prose of a lot of corporate articles, but has loads of material that could be taken as unsubstantiated claims and deleted. - BulldozerD11 ( talk) 12:33, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Grant Thornton LLP. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:36, 22 October 2017 (UTC)