![]() | A fact from Grand Theft Auto V (re-release) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 19 January 2015 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Dom497 ( talk · contribs) 02:28, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
I'll review the article. But I do have one critical question before I start: Why can this article not be merged with the main GTA V article? I don't see the need for two articles about the same thing.--
Dom497 (
talk)
02:28, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
@ CR4ZE: On hold for 7 days.-- Dom497 ( talk) 18:42, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Anyone have a strong reason why we should not include details on the numerous severe launch week problems for the PC version? Examples include:
- GTA 5 not installing or not playing due to strange characters in Windows username - The various Rockstar Social Club launcher errors - GTA 5 for PC not launching with Steam – laptops - Losing saved vehicles in GTA Online when transferring from PlayStation 3 or Xbox 360 to PC - GTA 5 not installing because you don’t have Windows Media Player
I propose that Grand Theft Auto V (re-release) be merged into Grand Theft Auto V. I think that the content in the Grand Theft Auto V (re-release) article can easily be explained in the context of the Grand Theft Auto V article, and the Grand Theft Auto V article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Grand Theft Auto V (re-release) article will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. It is the same game literally having pages for versions of a game released on different platforms is ludicrous. Yes there are some features exclusive to some platforms but I do not think that warrants a separate article, having the information here only makes it harder to find as anyone looking for it will likely look on the Grand Theft Auto V article. Mainline421 ( talk) 17:13, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: A larger discussion can be found at the Grand Theft Auto V talk page. -- Rhain1999 ( talk to me) 21:01, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
It wouldn't hurt. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.220.233.212 ( talk) 15:48, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
How could they be not notable? I'm not thinking of Wikipedia as a game page or whatever, but i guess this game needs high requirements from any machine, and that should be enough. Sign: me (damn this public IP) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.220.233.212 ( talk) 19:48, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
![]() | A fact from Grand Theft Auto V (re-release) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 19 January 2015 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Dom497 ( talk · contribs) 02:28, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
I'll review the article. But I do have one critical question before I start: Why can this article not be merged with the main GTA V article? I don't see the need for two articles about the same thing.--
Dom497 (
talk)
02:28, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
@ CR4ZE: On hold for 7 days.-- Dom497 ( talk) 18:42, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Anyone have a strong reason why we should not include details on the numerous severe launch week problems for the PC version? Examples include:
- GTA 5 not installing or not playing due to strange characters in Windows username - The various Rockstar Social Club launcher errors - GTA 5 for PC not launching with Steam – laptops - Losing saved vehicles in GTA Online when transferring from PlayStation 3 or Xbox 360 to PC - GTA 5 not installing because you don’t have Windows Media Player
I propose that Grand Theft Auto V (re-release) be merged into Grand Theft Auto V. I think that the content in the Grand Theft Auto V (re-release) article can easily be explained in the context of the Grand Theft Auto V article, and the Grand Theft Auto V article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Grand Theft Auto V (re-release) article will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. It is the same game literally having pages for versions of a game released on different platforms is ludicrous. Yes there are some features exclusive to some platforms but I do not think that warrants a separate article, having the information here only makes it harder to find as anyone looking for it will likely look on the Grand Theft Auto V article. Mainline421 ( talk) 17:13, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: A larger discussion can be found at the Grand Theft Auto V talk page. -- Rhain1999 ( talk to me) 21:01, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
It wouldn't hurt. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.220.233.212 ( talk) 15:48, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
How could they be not notable? I'm not thinking of Wikipedia as a game page or whatever, but i guess this game needs high requirements from any machine, and that should be enough. Sign: me (damn this public IP) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.220.233.212 ( talk) 19:48, 23 May 2015 (UTC)