Second Avenue: Three duplicate links in the first paragraph: IND Sixth Avenue Lines, Manhattan Bridge, and Second Avenue Subway.
Done.
The link to cut and cover has a ".29" at the end, throwing off the link directly to the section. If the intention is not to link directly to the section within the
Tunnel article, then modify the piping to remove the direct section link.
Done.
References: Cite #1 has a different date format to the others
That's an unusual case in that it's used in other articles. But I'll do it.
Cite #2: I'd drop the nytimes.com bit and just have the source be The New York Times, which also needs to be in italics.
Cite #3: NYT needs to be in italics.
Cite #4: I'd do the same as the change to Cite #2 - however, if you're going to put (New York) in brackets afterwards, then you need to do that in Cite #1 as well. No italics here though.
Cite #6: Access date?
Cite #8: Currently a bit inaccurate. List the original publisher as the source and then add "via=
Internet Archive". Internet Archive also shouldn't be in italics.
Cite #10: Date format different to others. Also the title of the source is wrong and lists the website there for some reason as well.
Cite #12, 13 and 14: NYT needs to be in italics.
Cite #16: Needs to match the formatting of #1 and #4, whatever that may be. Same with 21, 22 etc.
Cite #18, 19, 20: Need to be fully filled out to match your other citations.
Cite #29: Different date format.
For all of the above: Doing, since the citation order has changed drastically since the review.
Great. Regarding the date format - there's nothing wrong with using that particular date format, only that an article should all have dates in the same format. The only requirement here would be that since this is a NYC subway station, it should be an American date format, which it is. Anyway, it's all sort now and I'm happy to promote based on this meeting the criteria for GA.
Miyagawa (
talk)
21:01, 14 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Second Avenue: Three duplicate links in the first paragraph: IND Sixth Avenue Lines, Manhattan Bridge, and Second Avenue Subway.
Done.
The link to cut and cover has a ".29" at the end, throwing off the link directly to the section. If the intention is not to link directly to the section within the
Tunnel article, then modify the piping to remove the direct section link.
Done.
References: Cite #1 has a different date format to the others
That's an unusual case in that it's used in other articles. But I'll do it.
Cite #2: I'd drop the nytimes.com bit and just have the source be The New York Times, which also needs to be in italics.
Cite #3: NYT needs to be in italics.
Cite #4: I'd do the same as the change to Cite #2 - however, if you're going to put (New York) in brackets afterwards, then you need to do that in Cite #1 as well. No italics here though.
Cite #6: Access date?
Cite #8: Currently a bit inaccurate. List the original publisher as the source and then add "via=
Internet Archive". Internet Archive also shouldn't be in italics.
Cite #10: Date format different to others. Also the title of the source is wrong and lists the website there for some reason as well.
Cite #12, 13 and 14: NYT needs to be in italics.
Cite #16: Needs to match the formatting of #1 and #4, whatever that may be. Same with 21, 22 etc.
Cite #18, 19, 20: Need to be fully filled out to match your other citations.
Cite #29: Different date format.
For all of the above: Doing, since the citation order has changed drastically since the review.
Great. Regarding the date format - there's nothing wrong with using that particular date format, only that an article should all have dates in the same format. The only requirement here would be that since this is a NYC subway station, it should be an American date format, which it is. Anyway, it's all sort now and I'm happy to promote based on this meeting the criteria for GA.
Miyagawa (
talk)
21:01, 14 August 2016 (UTC)reply