This
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The usage of Grain is under discussion, see talk:food grain -- 70.51.202.113 ( talk) 05:46, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
There is a small error in the chart. In the top left, where it relates the phi conversion, it gives the equation as "phi = log2(d in mm)", when it should be "phi = -log2(d in mm)". I don't think anything should be changed, as that's the actual chart, but I wanted it noted on the talk page for clarity. LordQwert ( talk) 16:40, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
In the lede sentence, "particle size" is mentioned as another name for this concept/article. Yet there is a separate article specifically on particle size and is even listed as a separate term in the Granulometry sidebar. So should that part of the intro sentence be removed as an alternate term for "grain size"? – Lestatdelc ( talk) 21:23, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
The article in question: Sorting (sediment). It might help clarify the section.
I thought about it, but I'm not very familiar with the terminology, and I don't want to make an erroneous change. Adding a hyperlink to the section title feels a bit off. The French Wikipedia article references it as "Article connexe : Classement granulométrique." Would that be a subtitle of 'Related section: Sorting (sediment)'...? DylanLow108 ( talk) 16:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
This
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The usage of Grain is under discussion, see talk:food grain -- 70.51.202.113 ( talk) 05:46, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
There is a small error in the chart. In the top left, where it relates the phi conversion, it gives the equation as "phi = log2(d in mm)", when it should be "phi = -log2(d in mm)". I don't think anything should be changed, as that's the actual chart, but I wanted it noted on the talk page for clarity. LordQwert ( talk) 16:40, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
In the lede sentence, "particle size" is mentioned as another name for this concept/article. Yet there is a separate article specifically on particle size and is even listed as a separate term in the Granulometry sidebar. So should that part of the intro sentence be removed as an alternate term for "grain size"? – Lestatdelc ( talk) 21:23, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
The article in question: Sorting (sediment). It might help clarify the section.
I thought about it, but I'm not very familiar with the terminology, and I don't want to make an erroneous change. Adding a hyperlink to the section title feels a bit off. The French Wikipedia article references it as "Article connexe : Classement granulométrique." Would that be a subtitle of 'Related section: Sorting (sediment)'...? DylanLow108 ( talk) 16:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC)