This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lancashire and Cumbria High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. Historic sites This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I've had a go at putting the entries into logical groups and flagged them up using HTML comments. IMHO this makes the list more rational but

• The groups are arbitrary, e.g. should city walls near the castle be grouped as walls or castle?
• The list may already have been in a logical sequence that I didn't spot
• If the groupings are retained, we could do with subheadings within the list, probably achieved by splitting the table.

Any comments? -- Northernhenge ( talk) 18:03, 29 August 2013 (UTC) reply