![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of Gotha Go P.60 be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Not sure if an article with a single line, supported by a single citation to an entry in a website, can be qualified even as a "stub". I'll give the benefit of doubt and hope that the article creator will improve it as part of March Madness 2017. Regards, DPdH ( talk) 20:04, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
The various sources disagree with each other on certain points. One challenge will be to cover who says what without bogging down the narrative. In general I think that Sharp and Rose are the most reliable with the earlier accounts lacking information uncovered within the last two decades.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 16:57, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of Gotha Go P.60 be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Not sure if an article with a single line, supported by a single citation to an entry in a website, can be qualified even as a "stub". I'll give the benefit of doubt and hope that the article creator will improve it as part of March Madness 2017. Regards, DPdH ( talk) 20:04, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
The various sources disagree with each other on certain points. One challenge will be to cover who says what without bogging down the narrative. In general I think that Sharp and Rose are the most reliable with the earlier accounts lacking information uncovered within the last two decades.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 16:57, 29 August 2022 (UTC)