This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Gospel of Mark article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6Auto-archiving period: 90 days
![]() |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The redirect
Mark, Gospel of has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 11 § Mark, Gospel of until a consensus is reached.
Veverve (
talk)
07:13, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi, Pbritti. Please select two or three references from my edit and cite those. tgeorgescu ( talk) 17:20, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
controversial, Holman bibles do not count because they are too conservative (
unscholarly), Witherington because although he is on her side, he actually gives her the lie, etc. tgeorgescu ( talk) 18:50, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
I recently edited the titles for all four of the gospels of the New Testament, seeing as I thought it fit to input one of the four gospels of the New Testament as not so much longer, as the maximum character limit is 90 characters, but as to improve readability and to improve the description so as to give a more ample overview of what the article was, as these are seen as teasers of the article Ai777 ( talk) 20:59, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
@ Dr Christopher Bryan: You have to obey WP:RS/AC, just like everybody else. If you have been published at OUP, you certainly have read WP:SOURCES such as those listed at User:Tgeorgescu/sandbox3. These sources tell a different story than your WP:POV. tgeorgescu ( talk) 13:40, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
@
Pbritti: Rejecting
WP:RS/AC on the ground that there are too many sources is
WP:TE.
tgeorgescu (
talk)
21:57, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Struck since you agree with me. tgeorgescu ( talk) 22:00, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Hint: it only concerns the Gospel of Johnand at least two references only about Matthew. That is disruptive. I am about to restore a couple sources that appropriately reference the "most scholars" claim.
Christianity is so influenced by Paul's use of "gospel" in reference to Jesus that it too frequently forgets that, in the synoptics, Jesus is the messenger of it not the subject of it. In Mark, Jesus indicates that the "good news" is the impending arrival of the Kingdom of God on Earth. Apologists want to project their modern theology onto that and claim it's about crucifixion and resurrection, but that's simply not what the text says. Here, "gospel" is not about Jesus himself; it's just announced by him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:8C0:980:E520:A123:A51D:6D83:92DE ( talk) 17:03, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Gospel of Mark article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6Auto-archiving period: 90 days
![]() |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The redirect
Mark, Gospel of has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 11 § Mark, Gospel of until a consensus is reached.
Veverve (
talk)
07:13, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi, Pbritti. Please select two or three references from my edit and cite those. tgeorgescu ( talk) 17:20, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
controversial, Holman bibles do not count because they are too conservative (
unscholarly), Witherington because although he is on her side, he actually gives her the lie, etc. tgeorgescu ( talk) 18:50, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
I recently edited the titles for all four of the gospels of the New Testament, seeing as I thought it fit to input one of the four gospels of the New Testament as not so much longer, as the maximum character limit is 90 characters, but as to improve readability and to improve the description so as to give a more ample overview of what the article was, as these are seen as teasers of the article Ai777 ( talk) 20:59, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
@ Dr Christopher Bryan: You have to obey WP:RS/AC, just like everybody else. If you have been published at OUP, you certainly have read WP:SOURCES such as those listed at User:Tgeorgescu/sandbox3. These sources tell a different story than your WP:POV. tgeorgescu ( talk) 13:40, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
@
Pbritti: Rejecting
WP:RS/AC on the ground that there are too many sources is
WP:TE.
tgeorgescu (
talk)
21:57, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Struck since you agree with me. tgeorgescu ( talk) 22:00, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Hint: it only concerns the Gospel of Johnand at least two references only about Matthew. That is disruptive. I am about to restore a couple sources that appropriately reference the "most scholars" claim.
Christianity is so influenced by Paul's use of "gospel" in reference to Jesus that it too frequently forgets that, in the synoptics, Jesus is the messenger of it not the subject of it. In Mark, Jesus indicates that the "good news" is the impending arrival of the Kingdom of God on Earth. Apologists want to project their modern theology onto that and claim it's about crucifixion and resurrection, but that's simply not what the text says. Here, "gospel" is not about Jesus himself; it's just announced by him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:8C0:980:E520:A123:A51D:6D83:92DE ( talk) 17:03, 23 June 2024 (UTC)