This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

UK geography Mid‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Cities This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles West Midlands Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject West Midlands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of West Midlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.West MidlandsWikipedia:WikiProject West MidlandsTemplate:WikiProject West MidlandsWest Midlands articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I created an article here in place of the redirect from Sedgley, as I felt that the redirect was unhelpful for a couple of reasons. First, Gospel End has been administered separately since 1897. Second, the Sedgley article said very little about Gospel End, and the details in the infobox (county, borough, parliamentary constituency, etc.) didn't apply to Gospel End. Granted, there's not much to say about Gospel End, but having it redirect to Sedgley wasn't especially helpful. -- RFBailey ( talk) 04:50, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply