From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleGordon McClymont has been listed as one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 25, 2013 Good article nomineeListed
On this day...A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on May 8, 2020.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Gordon McClymont/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Curly Turkey ( talk · contribs) 05:31, 5 June 2013 (UTC) reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    Nicely written. Only a couple of hairsplits:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
    Everything's duly reffed with inline cites, but there are some inconsistencies in the cites:
    C. No original research:
    As far as I can tell. I can't access all of the sources.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    As far as I'm aware
    B. Focused:
    The article seems to get to the point very well.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    I'm not an expert on the subject, but I can detect no obvious bias.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
    No images at all. Are there no pictures of the man that could be used with a Fair Use Rationale? No photos of the university?
    • I added a photo of the university and of one of his awards. I don't have any photos of him that are decent enough quality to upload under a fair use license and I haven't found any public domain images. I'm still looking but it may take awhile. Cla68 ( talk) 12:47, 25 June 2013 (UTC) reply
      The images look fine, and the licences check out. If you're planning on taking this article farther I'd recommend adding WP:ALTTEXT to the images. Curly Turkey ( gobble) 23:12, 25 June 2013 (UTC) reply
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
I have fixed some of your suggestions. This is the first time I have seen the article and thought I would help out. Michael73072 ( talk) 04:42, 10 June 2013 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gordon McClymont. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:51, 21 October 2017 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleGordon McClymont has been listed as one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 25, 2013 Good article nomineeListed
On this day...A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on May 8, 2020.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Gordon McClymont/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Curly Turkey ( talk · contribs) 05:31, 5 June 2013 (UTC) reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    Nicely written. Only a couple of hairsplits:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
    Everything's duly reffed with inline cites, but there are some inconsistencies in the cites:
    C. No original research:
    As far as I can tell. I can't access all of the sources.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    As far as I'm aware
    B. Focused:
    The article seems to get to the point very well.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    I'm not an expert on the subject, but I can detect no obvious bias.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
    No images at all. Are there no pictures of the man that could be used with a Fair Use Rationale? No photos of the university?
    • I added a photo of the university and of one of his awards. I don't have any photos of him that are decent enough quality to upload under a fair use license and I haven't found any public domain images. I'm still looking but it may take awhile. Cla68 ( talk) 12:47, 25 June 2013 (UTC) reply
      The images look fine, and the licences check out. If you're planning on taking this article farther I'd recommend adding WP:ALTTEXT to the images. Curly Turkey ( gobble) 23:12, 25 June 2013 (UTC) reply
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
I have fixed some of your suggestions. This is the first time I have seen the article and thought I would help out. Michael73072 ( talk) 04:42, 10 June 2013 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gordon McClymont. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:51, 21 October 2017 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook