![]() | Gordodon has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 28, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Gordodon appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 24 April 2021 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Dunkleosteus77 ( talk · contribs) 22:33, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Overall well written article, and not too much literature out there on it since the taxon is only 3 years old User:Dunkleosteus77 | push to talk 22:33, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
MeegsC (
talk) 08:39, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by DrawingDinosaurs ( talk). Self-nominated at 14:45, 30 March 2021 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall:
ALT1 is much more interesting, especially with the image.
Epicgenius (
talk) 13:27, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
or
It reads a bit awkwardly at the moment. MeegsC ( talk) 15:19, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
![]() | Gordodon has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 28, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Gordodon appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 24 April 2021 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Dunkleosteus77 ( talk · contribs) 22:33, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Overall well written article, and not too much literature out there on it since the taxon is only 3 years old User:Dunkleosteus77 | push to talk 22:33, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
MeegsC (
talk) 08:39, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by DrawingDinosaurs ( talk). Self-nominated at 14:45, 30 March 2021 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall:
ALT1 is much more interesting, especially with the image.
Epicgenius (
talk) 13:27, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
or
It reads a bit awkwardly at the moment. MeegsC ( talk) 15:19, 17 April 2021 (UTC)