This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In a cited article, Google stated that they came up with the name 'Hummingbird' because they considered it to be synonymous with precise and fast. But the addition to this article was reverted. I just want to argue that it is relevant to notate the authors intended meaning of the name, and how it came to be chosen. David Condrey ( talk) 06:50, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
Removed spam links from India, plus tidied up the poor English grammer (30 Sep 2013)
The 'smart' users of Google-search-hummingbird will still be able to use the Advanced Search panel, and/or enter directly their own 'complex' search-strings. What's the downside? -- Charles Edwin Shipp ( talk) 12:59, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
WOW, this article is very 'nice' but ultra-short, like a hummingbird. And it does not even include the word, 'semantic' which is the whole motivation for the new engine, 'hummingbird'. I'll see what I can do on that aspect; or at least watch your editing--hint, hint. ;-) "-) :-) TIA, Charles Edwin Shipp ( talk) 12:56, 25 April 2014 (UTC) PS: I really like the lede, hummingbird from Google.
Under Features it sounds like Latent semantic indexing which is not mentioned. How are they different ? - Rod57 ( talk) 13:41, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Is there any indication that the logo is the official logo for Google Hummingbird? The website it came ( https://www.verticalresponse.com/blog/google-hummingbird-update/) from makes no such claim. There are many unofficial logos all over the internet created for SEO blogs, and this just appears to be one of them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Needsleep99 ( talk • contribs) 05:08, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In a cited article, Google stated that they came up with the name 'Hummingbird' because they considered it to be synonymous with precise and fast. But the addition to this article was reverted. I just want to argue that it is relevant to notate the authors intended meaning of the name, and how it came to be chosen. David Condrey ( talk) 06:50, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
Removed spam links from India, plus tidied up the poor English grammer (30 Sep 2013)
The 'smart' users of Google-search-hummingbird will still be able to use the Advanced Search panel, and/or enter directly their own 'complex' search-strings. What's the downside? -- Charles Edwin Shipp ( talk) 12:59, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
WOW, this article is very 'nice' but ultra-short, like a hummingbird. And it does not even include the word, 'semantic' which is the whole motivation for the new engine, 'hummingbird'. I'll see what I can do on that aspect; or at least watch your editing--hint, hint. ;-) "-) :-) TIA, Charles Edwin Shipp ( talk) 12:56, 25 April 2014 (UTC) PS: I really like the lede, hummingbird from Google.
Under Features it sounds like Latent semantic indexing which is not mentioned. How are they different ? - Rod57 ( talk) 13:41, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Is there any indication that the logo is the official logo for Google Hummingbird? The website it came ( https://www.verticalresponse.com/blog/google-hummingbird-update/) from makes no such claim. There are many unofficial logos all over the internet created for SEO blogs, and this just appears to be one of them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Needsleep99 ( talk • contribs) 05:08, 6 March 2020 (UTC)