A news item involving Google DeepMind was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 28 January 2016. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Google DeepMind article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Google DeepMind. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Google DeepMind at the Reference desk. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The current link for the Gatsby unit is wrong. Tried to replace with hyperlink to its homepage http://www.gatsby.ucl.ac.uk but defeated by syntax. May be someone can fix the error? Bill — Preceding unsigned comment added by W102102 ( talk • contribs) 11:43, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2086454-revealed-google-ai-has-access-to-huge-haul-of-nhs-patient-data -- 91.10.33.46 ( talk) 21:14, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved as uncontroversial. SST flyer 05:05, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Google DeepMind →
DeepMind – Name of the company has changed, see website. Now operating under the Alphabet holding company, Google branding has been dropped. –
Acopyeditor (
talk) 22:39, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Is it really a "company", or was it really started as one? Most of the work they do on WaveNet is open source, and their website reads more like they're a non-profit research institute. I hardly know of any company whose research department is as fully transparent and accessible to the public and their results and working materials all published as open source. -- 2003:EF:13C6:FE22:9877:F5AE:80F4:F7F6 ( talk) 11:47, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
AlphaCode - comment from Scott Aaronson / the blog Shtetl-Optimized
"AlphaCode as a dog speaking mediocre English"
somebody might want to incorporate this into the article
- 2804:14D:5C59:8693:C90B:569:3EFF:444A ( talk) 23:01, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi,
I'd like to request that the following be removed from the History section:
In December 2019, co-founder Suleyman announced he would be leaving DeepMind to join Google, working in a policy role.
[1]In 2021,
the Wall Street Journal revealed that Suleyman had been placed on leave at DeepMind in 2019, following an investigation into employees' allegations that he had bullied them.
[2] The company hired an external lawyer to investigate allegations that Suleyman had bullied employees, and he was placed on a leave of absence, before leaving to join Google. An email sent to staff after the story broke, published by
Business Insider, said Suleyman's "management style fell short" of expected standards.
[3]
Business Insider also published further details of historical allegations of bullying against Suleyman, including claims that he boasted about "crushing people", "had a habit of flying off the handle out of nowhere", and demanded employees carry out tasks unrelated to their jobs.
[4]
This information is already included in the article focused on Mustafa Suleyman, and is both redundant and irrelevant for inclusion in the DeepMind article, which focuses on the history and information surrounding the company itself.
Bringing this to the attention of Andrevan, who reviewed the edit requests at Talk:Mustafa Suleyman and is therefore familiar with the subject and context.
Thanks for your time, MforSuleyman ( talk) 13:47, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
References
MforSuleyman ( talk) 13:47, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
In the article, GOogle Brain is described as a division of Google AI. But Google AI is itself a division (see Google AI)... Am I missing something? 103.114.126.34 ( talk) 08:21, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
A news item involving Google DeepMind was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 28 January 2016. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Google DeepMind article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Google DeepMind. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Google DeepMind at the Reference desk. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The current link for the Gatsby unit is wrong. Tried to replace with hyperlink to its homepage http://www.gatsby.ucl.ac.uk but defeated by syntax. May be someone can fix the error? Bill — Preceding unsigned comment added by W102102 ( talk • contribs) 11:43, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2086454-revealed-google-ai-has-access-to-huge-haul-of-nhs-patient-data -- 91.10.33.46 ( talk) 21:14, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved as uncontroversial. SST flyer 05:05, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Google DeepMind →
DeepMind – Name of the company has changed, see website. Now operating under the Alphabet holding company, Google branding has been dropped. –
Acopyeditor (
talk) 22:39, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Is it really a "company", or was it really started as one? Most of the work they do on WaveNet is open source, and their website reads more like they're a non-profit research institute. I hardly know of any company whose research department is as fully transparent and accessible to the public and their results and working materials all published as open source. -- 2003:EF:13C6:FE22:9877:F5AE:80F4:F7F6 ( talk) 11:47, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
AlphaCode - comment from Scott Aaronson / the blog Shtetl-Optimized
"AlphaCode as a dog speaking mediocre English"
somebody might want to incorporate this into the article
- 2804:14D:5C59:8693:C90B:569:3EFF:444A ( talk) 23:01, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi,
I'd like to request that the following be removed from the History section:
In December 2019, co-founder Suleyman announced he would be leaving DeepMind to join Google, working in a policy role.
[1]In 2021,
the Wall Street Journal revealed that Suleyman had been placed on leave at DeepMind in 2019, following an investigation into employees' allegations that he had bullied them.
[2] The company hired an external lawyer to investigate allegations that Suleyman had bullied employees, and he was placed on a leave of absence, before leaving to join Google. An email sent to staff after the story broke, published by
Business Insider, said Suleyman's "management style fell short" of expected standards.
[3]
Business Insider also published further details of historical allegations of bullying against Suleyman, including claims that he boasted about "crushing people", "had a habit of flying off the handle out of nowhere", and demanded employees carry out tasks unrelated to their jobs.
[4]
This information is already included in the article focused on Mustafa Suleyman, and is both redundant and irrelevant for inclusion in the DeepMind article, which focuses on the history and information surrounding the company itself.
Bringing this to the attention of Andrevan, who reviewed the edit requests at Talk:Mustafa Suleyman and is therefore familiar with the subject and context.
Thanks for your time, MforSuleyman ( talk) 13:47, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
References
MforSuleyman ( talk) 13:47, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
In the article, GOogle Brain is described as a division of Google AI. But Google AI is itself a division (see Google AI)... Am I missing something? 103.114.126.34 ( talk) 08:21, 23 May 2023 (UTC)