This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to
Supreme Court cases and the
Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of
Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
"It is possible that Harriet Miers helped create the government's argument in the case." What does this mean? I did not change it, but I do not understand it. I changed the next sentence since she has withdrawn. --
Rob13:59, 27 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Government lawyers were arguing against the Oregon statute, and Miers may have advised them on the arguments they should make, cases they should cite, etc.
BD2412talk14:09, 27 October 2005 (UTC)reply
case summaries
the summary of the opinion and the dissent is bad should be re written to include reference to Auer and a more detailed outline of the reasoning not just one or two of the less than crucial points —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
149.175.108.53 (
talk)
09:49, 1 October 2008 (UTC)reply
This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to
Supreme Court cases and the
Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of
Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
"It is possible that Harriet Miers helped create the government's argument in the case." What does this mean? I did not change it, but I do not understand it. I changed the next sentence since she has withdrawn. --
Rob13:59, 27 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Government lawyers were arguing against the Oregon statute, and Miers may have advised them on the arguments they should make, cases they should cite, etc.
BD2412talk14:09, 27 October 2005 (UTC)reply
case summaries
the summary of the opinion and the dissent is bad should be re written to include reference to Auer and a more detailed outline of the reasoning not just one or two of the less than crucial points —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
149.175.108.53 (
talk)
09:49, 1 October 2008 (UTC)reply