This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Books This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles This article has been marked as needing an infobox. Medicine Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The book has been described as "one of the most outstanding textbooks of medicine ever written".[3] references Cecil's itself. A book should not be able to endorse itself. Jtopf ( talk) 19:07, 23 October 2014 (UTC) reply

It should be mentioned that until its 24th edition it was only called Cecil Medicine. It was only on the 25th edition (released on April 25th, I believe), that they changed it to Goldman-Cecil, much to my dislike, since this is only the second edition in which Goldman is an editor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.133.84.50 ( talk) 03:03, 12 May 2015 (UTC) reply