This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
This page appears to be the product of a cut-and-paste move; the content was previously at Golden age. And why the capitalization here of "Age"? -- Jmabel | Talk 21:20, September 5, 2005 (UTC)
" Chinese Golden Age, around 1000 AD. From the beginning of the Tang Dynasty to the end of the Han Dynasty" was recently anonymously changed without comment to " Chinese Golden Age, around 1000 AD. From the beginning of the Tang Dynasty to the end of the Tang Dynasty" (emphasis mine). I don't know enough to clear this up, our articles are stubs. 1000 AD would be a bit late for Tang Dynasty. Does someone have something citable? -- Jmabel | Talk 23:28, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
I've created Golden Age (disambiguation) which seems like the clearest place for all the disambiguation stuff to live, so I removed that section from Golden Age (metaphor). We should probably redirect The Golden Age to Golden Age (disambiguation), rather than "merge" it with Golden Age (metaphor). So to be clear, I vote no merge. j-beda 17:46, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
I agree with the redirect, as long as care is taken that no info is lost. Cvj2000 15:22, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
The capitalization here is inconsistent: the title spells "Golden Age" while the opening sentence says "golden age". Which is correct? Nabbia ( talk) 17:14, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
While the concept of a Golden Age always involves a value judgement, here the article leaves unclear who or what tradition considers these to be "golden ages". Consider these expressions in the article:
I find the state of the article surprisingly poor for such a widely used concept. Dimadick ( talk) 00:25, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
I removed the POV tag because it normally suggests a bias problem. The main problem noted by Dimadick is not one of bias or point of view, but rather that the list of metaphoric Golden Ages has no citations showing who considers them golden and why. Some list items are supported by links to other Wikipedia articles, which though not specifically mentioning the phrase golden age do document the age's cultural or economic importance, e.g. Elizabethan and Victorian England. What I think what this article most needs is incremental improvement of documentation of most of the listed golden ages, and removal of a few alleged golden ages for which no reliable source of its alleged importance can be found, rather than correction of a point-of-view problem. CharlesHBennett ( talk) 04:25, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Golden age (metaphor). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:55, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Golden age (metaphor). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:40, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
This page appears to be the product of a cut-and-paste move; the content was previously at Golden age. And why the capitalization here of "Age"? -- Jmabel | Talk 21:20, September 5, 2005 (UTC)
" Chinese Golden Age, around 1000 AD. From the beginning of the Tang Dynasty to the end of the Han Dynasty" was recently anonymously changed without comment to " Chinese Golden Age, around 1000 AD. From the beginning of the Tang Dynasty to the end of the Tang Dynasty" (emphasis mine). I don't know enough to clear this up, our articles are stubs. 1000 AD would be a bit late for Tang Dynasty. Does someone have something citable? -- Jmabel | Talk 23:28, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
I've created Golden Age (disambiguation) which seems like the clearest place for all the disambiguation stuff to live, so I removed that section from Golden Age (metaphor). We should probably redirect The Golden Age to Golden Age (disambiguation), rather than "merge" it with Golden Age (metaphor). So to be clear, I vote no merge. j-beda 17:46, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
I agree with the redirect, as long as care is taken that no info is lost. Cvj2000 15:22, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
The capitalization here is inconsistent: the title spells "Golden Age" while the opening sentence says "golden age". Which is correct? Nabbia ( talk) 17:14, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
While the concept of a Golden Age always involves a value judgement, here the article leaves unclear who or what tradition considers these to be "golden ages". Consider these expressions in the article:
I find the state of the article surprisingly poor for such a widely used concept. Dimadick ( talk) 00:25, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
I removed the POV tag because it normally suggests a bias problem. The main problem noted by Dimadick is not one of bias or point of view, but rather that the list of metaphoric Golden Ages has no citations showing who considers them golden and why. Some list items are supported by links to other Wikipedia articles, which though not specifically mentioning the phrase golden age do document the age's cultural or economic importance, e.g. Elizabethan and Victorian England. What I think what this article most needs is incremental improvement of documentation of most of the listed golden ages, and removal of a few alleged golden ages for which no reliable source of its alleged importance can be found, rather than correction of a point-of-view problem. CharlesHBennett ( talk) 04:25, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Golden age (metaphor). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:55, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Golden age (metaphor). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:40, 9 January 2018 (UTC)