Gnarly (slang) is within the scope of the WikiProject Water sports, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
Water sports. If you would like to
participate, you can visit the
project page, where you can join the project and see a list of
open tasks.Water sportsWikipedia:WikiProject Water sportsTemplate:WikiProject Water sportsWater sports articles
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Glossaries, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.GlossariesWikipedia:WikiProject GlossariesTemplate:WikiProject GlossariesGlossaries articles
AfD
Although I understand the initial objection to this page, I feel that I have provided a culturally significant context in which this page should remain. I have included origins of the term based on narrative-driven research, cited the appropriate materials, and linked the page to several other relevant pages of origin. I feel that the content is thorough enough to maintain this page as altogether different from a standard dictionary entry.
Thank you for taking your concerns to the talk page. I'm going to remove the
WP:PROD and nominate the page for
WP:AfD, where we can discuss whether the page should keep and get other user's feedback.
Meatsgains (
talk)
02:59, 16 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Gnarly (slang) is within the scope of the WikiProject Water sports, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
Water sports. If you would like to
participate, you can visit the
project page, where you can join the project and see a list of
open tasks.Water sportsWikipedia:WikiProject Water sportsTemplate:WikiProject Water sportsWater sports articles
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Glossaries, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.GlossariesWikipedia:WikiProject GlossariesTemplate:WikiProject GlossariesGlossaries articles
AfD
Although I understand the initial objection to this page, I feel that I have provided a culturally significant context in which this page should remain. I have included origins of the term based on narrative-driven research, cited the appropriate materials, and linked the page to several other relevant pages of origin. I feel that the content is thorough enough to maintain this page as altogether different from a standard dictionary entry.
Thank you for taking your concerns to the talk page. I'm going to remove the
WP:PROD and nominate the page for
WP:AfD, where we can discuss whether the page should keep and get other user's feedback.
Meatsgains (
talk)
02:59, 16 March 2016 (UTC)reply
