Glynor Plet has been listed as one of the
Sports and recreation good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 13, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: JC Kotisow ( talk · contribs) 08:20, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
Pass. Generally clear and concise | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
| |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
Pass. No issue | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
good use of references and well detailed. | |
2c. it contains no original research. |
Pass. | |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. |
none detected | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. |
addresses career well | |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). |
Pass. Focuses on subject consistently | |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. |
Pass. no issue | |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. |
no issue so far | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | ||
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
7. Overall assessment. | Pending
Look at final review below |
@ User:Bocanegra Looking at this article already, this needs significant information and improvement about this person for it to be a GA class or even B-class. The lead section lacks information and needs to be expanded, meaning take into account what he achieved or ultimately went through (if significant); go into a bit more detail than just listing the clubs, the lead section is like a tiny summary of your whole article so list milestones and achievements. Your sentences and wording are pretty basic with some sentences needing to be shorter rather than longer to make a smoother reading experience but other than that, it passes. Your sections seem to be well-organised with simple headings, which is fine. Over than that, your article does not broadly cover the topic and only covers one aspect of the person which is his professional career, as a result, this article does not pass the GA criteria for now. I will put this on hold in hopes you can expand further and add more information on the subject at hand. JC Kotisow ( talk) 08:44, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
@ User:Bocanegra After reading your article, it seems to be looking really good. I'll suggest changes you can write in order to make it easier and compelling:
You don't need this since he has no connection to Plet
Summarise this:
Change this:
Note: Since you already said he took a step back, no need to say "another step back"
Remove these two sentences:
Change this:
and this:
Describe this since it was an achievement:
Move this:
Expand on Alanyaspor, just add a statistic; how many total league goals and appearances he made, including how many he started in those matches.
These are all my suggestions for now. I could ask you to try a "Style of play" section and an "Early life" section too. If you have trouble with Style of play or Early life thats ok, an example is below if you want to follow:
Early life and personal life
Plet was born on 30 January 1987 in Amsterdam, Netherlands to parents of Surinamese descent. His parents initially named him after, [Character], from the 1985 TV series MacGyver in which his parents were fans.
Style of play Example from link: [1]
Described as a powerful figure, Plet is mainly utilised as a striker. In attack, he uses his physicality and technique to hold the ball and create opportunities for overlapping teammates.
Anyway thats it for my second review if you have any questions or want to disucss feel free to ping me. JC Kotisow ( talk) 23:16, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
@ User:Bocanegra i am pleased to announce that your article passes GA-status and I will update the page soon after this message. Your article consistently stays on the subject, noting any achievement or milestone throughout his career, and is well organised in terms of context throughout the article. The images isn't a problem as stated in the criteria and I see your sections is improved and expanded. Congratulationss on your hard work. JC Kotisow ( talk) 22:37, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Glynor Plet has been listed as one of the
Sports and recreation good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 13, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: JC Kotisow ( talk · contribs) 08:20, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
Pass. Generally clear and concise | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
| |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
Pass. No issue | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
good use of references and well detailed. | |
2c. it contains no original research. |
Pass. | |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. |
none detected | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. |
addresses career well | |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). |
Pass. Focuses on subject consistently | |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. |
Pass. no issue | |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. |
no issue so far | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | ||
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
7. Overall assessment. | Pending
Look at final review below |
@ User:Bocanegra Looking at this article already, this needs significant information and improvement about this person for it to be a GA class or even B-class. The lead section lacks information and needs to be expanded, meaning take into account what he achieved or ultimately went through (if significant); go into a bit more detail than just listing the clubs, the lead section is like a tiny summary of your whole article so list milestones and achievements. Your sentences and wording are pretty basic with some sentences needing to be shorter rather than longer to make a smoother reading experience but other than that, it passes. Your sections seem to be well-organised with simple headings, which is fine. Over than that, your article does not broadly cover the topic and only covers one aspect of the person which is his professional career, as a result, this article does not pass the GA criteria for now. I will put this on hold in hopes you can expand further and add more information on the subject at hand. JC Kotisow ( talk) 08:44, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
@ User:Bocanegra After reading your article, it seems to be looking really good. I'll suggest changes you can write in order to make it easier and compelling:
You don't need this since he has no connection to Plet
Summarise this:
Change this:
Note: Since you already said he took a step back, no need to say "another step back"
Remove these two sentences:
Change this:
and this:
Describe this since it was an achievement:
Move this:
Expand on Alanyaspor, just add a statistic; how many total league goals and appearances he made, including how many he started in those matches.
These are all my suggestions for now. I could ask you to try a "Style of play" section and an "Early life" section too. If you have trouble with Style of play or Early life thats ok, an example is below if you want to follow:
Early life and personal life
Plet was born on 30 January 1987 in Amsterdam, Netherlands to parents of Surinamese descent. His parents initially named him after, [Character], from the 1985 TV series MacGyver in which his parents were fans.
Style of play Example from link: [1]
Described as a powerful figure, Plet is mainly utilised as a striker. In attack, he uses his physicality and technique to hold the ball and create opportunities for overlapping teammates.
Anyway thats it for my second review if you have any questions or want to disucss feel free to ping me. JC Kotisow ( talk) 23:16, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
@ User:Bocanegra i am pleased to announce that your article passes GA-status and I will update the page soon after this message. Your article consistently stays on the subject, noting any achievement or milestone throughout his career, and is well organised in terms of context throughout the article. The images isn't a problem as stated in the criteria and I see your sections is improved and expanded. Congratulationss on your hard work. JC Kotisow ( talk) 22:37, 13 July 2023 (UTC)