![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
A merge has been suggested between these two articles. It makes sense to me. A quick check as to which was the more common name shows it to be Glooscap by a fairly wide margin. Here is a comparison of number of search results for each term:
Accordingly, I propose to move the text of the Glooskap article to this one and make Glooskap a redirect. Comments? Sunray 17:57, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
I read about this connection in a book about the Knights Templar, but for the life of me I cannot remember what it was called. If anyone else is familiar with it, please let me know so I can properly cite my addition.-- Caliga10 15:35, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
Someone added a "Clean-up" tag to the article but neglected to state what was required. So I will wade in. The article is a hodge-podge of legends, but no sources are cited. Perhaps we could find some sources. Sunray 00:47, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
Since there are thousands of gods, many in Wikipedia, for consistency if one of them is stated as being due to a creation myth they should all be. Including the currently popular ones. The less divisive approach would be to remove the phrase from god descriptions throughout Wikipedia. NStahl ( talk) 12:19, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Glooscap. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:55, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Glooscap. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:05, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 23:51, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
A merge has been suggested between these two articles. It makes sense to me. A quick check as to which was the more common name shows it to be Glooscap by a fairly wide margin. Here is a comparison of number of search results for each term:
Accordingly, I propose to move the text of the Glooskap article to this one and make Glooskap a redirect. Comments? Sunray 17:57, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
I read about this connection in a book about the Knights Templar, but for the life of me I cannot remember what it was called. If anyone else is familiar with it, please let me know so I can properly cite my addition.-- Caliga10 15:35, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
Someone added a "Clean-up" tag to the article but neglected to state what was required. So I will wade in. The article is a hodge-podge of legends, but no sources are cited. Perhaps we could find some sources. Sunray 00:47, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
Since there are thousands of gods, many in Wikipedia, for consistency if one of them is stated as being due to a creation myth they should all be. Including the currently popular ones. The less divisive approach would be to remove the phrase from god descriptions throughout Wikipedia. NStahl ( talk) 12:19, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Glooscap. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:55, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Glooscap. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:05, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 23:51, 19 October 2018 (UTC)