![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This page has been
transwikied to
Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here ( logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
This article was listed for deletion on 9 April, 2005. The discussion was closed with the result of merge and redirect to byzantine art. This article will not be deleted. You can view the discussion, which is no longer live: Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Globus cruciger. -- Tony Sidaway| Talk 19:37, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Dark Ages should almost never be used in history articles, it's pretty much a political term. Also "ignorant" could be seen as a pejorative term. Ill add some more context. Stbalbach 05:32, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I recently found the Image:Heinrich III. (HRR) Miniatur.jpg, as well as the closeup. So now we have the four to choose from. I'll leave it up to your discretion, but I just wanted to let you know. (Though certainly it's helpful to have that close-up, and that's why I put it in already). -- Dmcdevit 23:59, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
Yes, if you include a gallery, I would suggest the inclusion of this painting; http://diglib.library.vanderbilt.edu/diglib-viewimage.pl?SID=2013031389843750&code=&RC=47430&Row=&code=act&return=act Regards, 96.19.147.40 ( talk) 21:25, 13 March 2013 (UTC)Ronald L. Hughes
This is a small article there really is only room for 2 good pictures otherwise the text is overcrowded and disjointed. The Danish GC is by far the most visually instructive, the English queen picture is beautiful and improves the esthetic value of the article. There are tons of GC pictures that could be added here so I have started a gallery. Stbalbach 14:52, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
At the risk of being obvious, doesn't the cross on top of the globe symbolize Christ's dominion over the world? J S Ayer 23:38, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
Regarding this connection with T&O maps
I've never seen this connection made before. Is there a source for this, or conjecture? -- Stbalbach 16:29, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Regarding this recent addition:
I couldn't find a decent source for this. According to the Dictionary of the Middle Ages it is "the early 400s". The coin of Arcadius shows him holding a globe but it is not clearly a globus cruciger. I'll change the text to reflect the ambiguity unless someone has a better source to clear it up. -- Stbalbach 13:57, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Sorry but the orb is not especifically a christianity symbol, i think that is better remove the "a Christian symbol of authority", replace by "a ancient symbol of authority". See at: here
Thank. Marcelo. Marcelognunez ( talk) 04:08, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcelognunez ( talk • contribs) 03:49, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
-- OK i have added Orb like hyperlink to the proper page, i understand globus cruciger is a specific Orb with a croix. Thank.-- Marcelognunez ( talk) 04:13, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Please see /info/en/?search=File:HerscherpaarMagdeburgCathedral.jpg and note that it is not without question that this IS Otto I and his wife Eagdyth. WHAT is he holding? An orb? A plan-view of a nearly-circular walled city? Something like the breast-plate of the Israelite High Priest? 2604:2000:C682:B600:FC9C:4C2:2514:9A8F ( talk) 15:45, 18 July 2016 (UTC)Christopher L. Simpson
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This page has been
transwikied to
Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here ( logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
This article was listed for deletion on 9 April, 2005. The discussion was closed with the result of merge and redirect to byzantine art. This article will not be deleted. You can view the discussion, which is no longer live: Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Globus cruciger. -- Tony Sidaway| Talk 19:37, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Dark Ages should almost never be used in history articles, it's pretty much a political term. Also "ignorant" could be seen as a pejorative term. Ill add some more context. Stbalbach 05:32, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I recently found the Image:Heinrich III. (HRR) Miniatur.jpg, as well as the closeup. So now we have the four to choose from. I'll leave it up to your discretion, but I just wanted to let you know. (Though certainly it's helpful to have that close-up, and that's why I put it in already). -- Dmcdevit 23:59, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
Yes, if you include a gallery, I would suggest the inclusion of this painting; http://diglib.library.vanderbilt.edu/diglib-viewimage.pl?SID=2013031389843750&code=&RC=47430&Row=&code=act&return=act Regards, 96.19.147.40 ( talk) 21:25, 13 March 2013 (UTC)Ronald L. Hughes
This is a small article there really is only room for 2 good pictures otherwise the text is overcrowded and disjointed. The Danish GC is by far the most visually instructive, the English queen picture is beautiful and improves the esthetic value of the article. There are tons of GC pictures that could be added here so I have started a gallery. Stbalbach 14:52, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
At the risk of being obvious, doesn't the cross on top of the globe symbolize Christ's dominion over the world? J S Ayer 23:38, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
Regarding this connection with T&O maps
I've never seen this connection made before. Is there a source for this, or conjecture? -- Stbalbach 16:29, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Regarding this recent addition:
I couldn't find a decent source for this. According to the Dictionary of the Middle Ages it is "the early 400s". The coin of Arcadius shows him holding a globe but it is not clearly a globus cruciger. I'll change the text to reflect the ambiguity unless someone has a better source to clear it up. -- Stbalbach 13:57, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Sorry but the orb is not especifically a christianity symbol, i think that is better remove the "a Christian symbol of authority", replace by "a ancient symbol of authority". See at: here
Thank. Marcelo. Marcelognunez ( talk) 04:08, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcelognunez ( talk • contribs) 03:49, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
-- OK i have added Orb like hyperlink to the proper page, i understand globus cruciger is a specific Orb with a croix. Thank.-- Marcelognunez ( talk) 04:13, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Please see /info/en/?search=File:HerscherpaarMagdeburgCathedral.jpg and note that it is not without question that this IS Otto I and his wife Eagdyth. WHAT is he holding? An orb? A plan-view of a nearly-circular walled city? Something like the breast-plate of the Israelite High Priest? 2604:2000:C682:B600:FC9C:4C2:2514:9A8F ( talk) 15:45, 18 July 2016 (UTC)Christopher L. Simpson