![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've tagged and been reverted, I made some mild edits that removed the puffery, and it is reverted. At this point, I feel you need to explain why the extra verbiage that adds nothing is needed, Cartoon network freak. Phrases like "it is one of the country's leading labels, having achieved notable commercial success" is a good example of puffery. If you have to say you are notable, you aren't. If you are notable, you don't have to say it. It sounds like a high school essay instead of an encyclopedia article. As for the names you reinserted, they do not have articles here, so we can't assume notability for them. You are welcome to start articles for those names. If they aren't linked, then you include the names of artists who have demonstrated notability by having an article here. We aren't a listing service, which is why we don't include an exhaustive list of all the people who they have signed. In fact, it would clearly be expected that most of their signed clients are new and NOT notable. That would be normal. You are not allowing any constructive edits to this page, which is certainly a problem, and needs to be solved now. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 21:46, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
I've edited this, so as an admin, I can't decline it myself, but obviously it needs to be declined. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 19:56, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 11:08, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've tagged and been reverted, I made some mild edits that removed the puffery, and it is reverted. At this point, I feel you need to explain why the extra verbiage that adds nothing is needed, Cartoon network freak. Phrases like "it is one of the country's leading labels, having achieved notable commercial success" is a good example of puffery. If you have to say you are notable, you aren't. If you are notable, you don't have to say it. It sounds like a high school essay instead of an encyclopedia article. As for the names you reinserted, they do not have articles here, so we can't assume notability for them. You are welcome to start articles for those names. If they aren't linked, then you include the names of artists who have demonstrated notability by having an article here. We aren't a listing service, which is why we don't include an exhaustive list of all the people who they have signed. In fact, it would clearly be expected that most of their signed clients are new and NOT notable. That would be normal. You are not allowing any constructive edits to this page, which is certainly a problem, and needs to be solved now. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 21:46, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
I've edited this, so as an admin, I can't decline it myself, but obviously it needs to be declined. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 19:56, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 11:08, 19 October 2021 (UTC)