 | This article was nominated for deletion on 12 July 2017. The result of the discussion was merge. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
A page should be created for Glenealy School. References could include past yearbooks and newspapers. Is there a template for schools? Hyungjoo98 ( talk) 12:51, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
This page was referenced by the LCSD Leisure and Cultural Services Department and Brand Hong Kong websites, both of which are governmental departments or sub-departments. They are clearly reliable reference sources from a third party. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hyungjoo98 ( talk • contribs) 05:53, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
- First, verifiability does not guarantee inclusion. The fact that a non notable piece of artwork by a non notable artist was added to the school is a resounding "so what?" Second please explain exactly how the two sources you mention above meet the criteria set forth at WP:RS. Third, stop edit warring this crap back into the article. The guideline for handling edit disputes on new content, WP:BRD, is quite ckear that once new content is removed, it stays out until consensus is reached. John from Idegon ( talk) 20:29, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
|
| This article was nominated for deletion on 12 July 2017. The result of the discussion was merge. |
|
| This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
A page should be created for Glenealy School. References could include past yearbooks and newspapers. Is there a template for schools? Hyungjoo98 ( talk) 12:51, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
This page was referenced by the LCSD Leisure and Cultural Services Department and Brand Hong Kong websites, both of which are governmental departments or sub-departments. They are clearly reliable reference sources from a third party. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hyungjoo98 ( talk • contribs) 05:53, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
- First, verifiability does not guarantee inclusion. The fact that a non notable piece of artwork by a non notable artist was added to the school is a resounding "so what?" Second please explain exactly how the two sources you mention above meet the criteria set forth at WP:RS. Third, stop edit warring this crap back into the article. The guideline for handling edit disputes on new content, WP:BRD, is quite ckear that once new content is removed, it stays out until consensus is reached. John from Idegon ( talk) 20:29, 12 August 2017 (UTC)