This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Glen Waverley railway station article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Glen Waverley railway station was nominated as a Engineering and technology good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (September 5, 2023, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Glen Waverley railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:43, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Kj cheetham ( talk · contribs) 11:30, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Starting review. - Kj cheetham ( talk) 11:30, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Some initial minor grammar suggestions, before I review the article more properly:
- Kj cheetham ( talk) 16:39, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Looking at the sections:
Early works on the project have already commenced, as of when? May want to use the {{as of}} template (as per WP:ASOF)?
NotOrrio, I've made a start on the review, please see above. I've not looked at sourcing yet though. - Kj cheetham ( talk) 17:40, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Sourcing spot-checks:
connected to Kingsway via a ramp on the station's eastern end?
NotOrrio, I'll put this on hold now to give you chance to address the points. Thanks. - Kj cheetham ( talk) 10:33, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
NotOrrio, P.S. Looking some more, I'm not convinced this is broad enough overall. For a station regularly getting over a million visitors a year and is almost 100 years old I'd expect more of a history.
Rebuilt 29 November 1964from the infobox should be explained in the main text.
The length of the platform is approximately 160 metres (520 ft), long enough for a Metro Trains 7-car High Capacity Metro Trains (HCMT)also needs a source. - Kj cheetham ( talk) 09:16, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Glen Waverley railway station article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Glen Waverley railway station was nominated as a Engineering and technology good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (September 5, 2023, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Glen Waverley railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:43, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Kj cheetham ( talk · contribs) 11:30, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Starting review. - Kj cheetham ( talk) 11:30, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Some initial minor grammar suggestions, before I review the article more properly:
- Kj cheetham ( talk) 16:39, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Looking at the sections:
Early works on the project have already commenced, as of when? May want to use the {{as of}} template (as per WP:ASOF)?
NotOrrio, I've made a start on the review, please see above. I've not looked at sourcing yet though. - Kj cheetham ( talk) 17:40, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Sourcing spot-checks:
connected to Kingsway via a ramp on the station's eastern end?
NotOrrio, I'll put this on hold now to give you chance to address the points. Thanks. - Kj cheetham ( talk) 10:33, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
NotOrrio, P.S. Looking some more, I'm not convinced this is broad enough overall. For a station regularly getting over a million visitors a year and is almost 100 years old I'd expect more of a history.
Rebuilt 29 November 1964from the infobox should be explained in the main text.
The length of the platform is approximately 160 metres (520 ft), long enough for a Metro Trains 7-car High Capacity Metro Trains (HCMT)also needs a source. - Kj cheetham ( talk) 09:16, 30 August 2023 (UTC)