This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is there a reason that the glass harmonica declined while the glass harp remained popular? Does have to do with maintenance, manufacturing, or even just styling of music over the years? I was also wondering if there was any information about these instruments further east. You'd mentioned in the early history that there's records of similar applications in Japan and Persia. What role have glass instruments played in more modern non-European contexts? Overall, really amazing article. Super well fleshed out with a plethora of historical sources that really capture the breadth of the topic. I really appreciated the focus on the history as it provides more context on these lesser-known instruments. Very well informed with a neutral tone. Great job! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maram543 ( talk • contribs) 18:47, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thanks for the article!.
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:58, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
I propose that the article Crystallophone should be folded into this article. Both articles designate the same thing. Jno.skinner ( talk) 04:51, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is there a reason that the glass harmonica declined while the glass harp remained popular? Does have to do with maintenance, manufacturing, or even just styling of music over the years? I was also wondering if there was any information about these instruments further east. You'd mentioned in the early history that there's records of similar applications in Japan and Persia. What role have glass instruments played in more modern non-European contexts? Overall, really amazing article. Super well fleshed out with a plethora of historical sources that really capture the breadth of the topic. I really appreciated the focus on the history as it provides more context on these lesser-known instruments. Very well informed with a neutral tone. Great job! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maram543 ( talk • contribs) 18:47, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thanks for the article!.
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:58, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
I propose that the article Crystallophone should be folded into this article. Both articles designate the same thing. Jno.skinner ( talk) 04:51, 29 September 2022 (UTC)