![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
For a Psychology writing course, a classmate and I rewrote the Implications section. We want to add subsections specifying the implications for women in the glass cliff position and implications for the organizations in which they are working. We also wish to add to the Explanation section, providing further details of the 2007 study referenced in the last paragraph of the section. Elijah Cohen ( talk) 19:25, 22 February 2015 (UTC)Eli Cohen
>>> In 1999 as the tech bubble was bursting, Hewlett-Packard appointed Carly Fiorina CEO, and then ousted her in 2005. She was appointed in July 1999. The Tech bubble burst in 2001 with a climax in March 2000. I really don't see how this is an example. The Compaq merger that was somewhat failed was her idea and that was in 2002. I also want to note that the citation linked doesn't mention her at all. Seems like a random link about Jill Abramson. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomji ( talk • contribs) 05:27, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
I removed this from the article. It reads like promotional material.
89.217.167.21 ( talk) 11:46, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
References
{{
cite journal}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
What if the glass cliff is unrelated to gender? If a company needs someone expendable then it will find it. If you show 1 thousand occasions where they choose a woman to take the risk, it proves nothing. It may easily be the case that in the same period of time 10 thousand men were selected because of the same reasons. The whole article ignores that this needs to be addressed.
And also, where is the usual "Criticism" section? Notinlist ( talk) 14:38, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Glass cliff. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:52, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
This whole theory seems to be an agglomeration of anectodal and/or cherry-picked evidence. Definitely needs a criticism section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrimas1 ( talk • contribs) 09:07, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 15 January 2023 and 26 April 2023. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Sjapatel (
article contribs). Peer reviewers:
Kamara03,
Gobears12.
— Assignment last updated by A.lejla ( talk) 19:20, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Though commonly applied in various fashions to more specific discriminatory practices, the concept of a 'Glass Cliff' itself has very little to do with any particular gender or race.
In essence, it is any situation, regardless of race or gender, whether political or economic or sociological in nature, where a subject is placed into a position, for whatever term of several consequence, with the formal intention to sabotage or to specifically direct the highest likelihood of failure towards blame of a particular individual or group. VerifyTruth01 ( talk) 20:55, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
For a Psychology writing course, a classmate and I rewrote the Implications section. We want to add subsections specifying the implications for women in the glass cliff position and implications for the organizations in which they are working. We also wish to add to the Explanation section, providing further details of the 2007 study referenced in the last paragraph of the section. Elijah Cohen ( talk) 19:25, 22 February 2015 (UTC)Eli Cohen
>>> In 1999 as the tech bubble was bursting, Hewlett-Packard appointed Carly Fiorina CEO, and then ousted her in 2005. She was appointed in July 1999. The Tech bubble burst in 2001 with a climax in March 2000. I really don't see how this is an example. The Compaq merger that was somewhat failed was her idea and that was in 2002. I also want to note that the citation linked doesn't mention her at all. Seems like a random link about Jill Abramson. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomji ( talk • contribs) 05:27, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
I removed this from the article. It reads like promotional material.
89.217.167.21 ( talk) 11:46, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
References
{{
cite journal}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
What if the glass cliff is unrelated to gender? If a company needs someone expendable then it will find it. If you show 1 thousand occasions where they choose a woman to take the risk, it proves nothing. It may easily be the case that in the same period of time 10 thousand men were selected because of the same reasons. The whole article ignores that this needs to be addressed.
And also, where is the usual "Criticism" section? Notinlist ( talk) 14:38, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Glass cliff. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:52, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
This whole theory seems to be an agglomeration of anectodal and/or cherry-picked evidence. Definitely needs a criticism section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrimas1 ( talk • contribs) 09:07, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 15 January 2023 and 26 April 2023. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Sjapatel (
article contribs). Peer reviewers:
Kamara03,
Gobears12.
— Assignment last updated by A.lejla ( talk) 19:20, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Though commonly applied in various fashions to more specific discriminatory practices, the concept of a 'Glass Cliff' itself has very little to do with any particular gender or race.
In essence, it is any situation, regardless of race or gender, whether political or economic or sociological in nature, where a subject is placed into a position, for whatever term of several consequence, with the formal intention to sabotage or to specifically direct the highest likelihood of failure towards blame of a particular individual or group. VerifyTruth01 ( talk) 20:55, 29 June 2024 (UTC)