GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Keihatsu ( talk · contribs) 22:51, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
I'm happy to review this one, though I need to warn you that it may take a few days. I'll post some initial comments shortly. Keihatsu talk 22:51, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Overall, the article looks great. Well done! Keihatsu talk 23:47, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Article has improved over the past few days. I was going to suggest expanding the intro and more wikilinks but you seen to have attended to that already. I'd standardize how the park is referred to...you could call it "the park" in the body of the article, but not too often. Other possibilities is to simply call it "Glacier" or "Glacier NP" to shorten, but you should pick one or the other to standardize. I'm not a reviewer so just consider my suggestions to be ones you can adopt or ignore as you choose.-- MONGO 16:05, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
"The park has 131 glaciers over 0.05 square metres (0.54 sq ft) in size" That would be a largish ice cube! Surely something has been lost in translation here. Half a square foot of ice? I don't have the referenced article but this does not pass the basic credibility test. There is no way half a square foot constitutes a glacier. Chann94501 ( talk) 18:27, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Keihatsu ( talk · contribs) 22:51, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
I'm happy to review this one, though I need to warn you that it may take a few days. I'll post some initial comments shortly. Keihatsu talk 22:51, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Overall, the article looks great. Well done! Keihatsu talk 23:47, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Article has improved over the past few days. I was going to suggest expanding the intro and more wikilinks but you seen to have attended to that already. I'd standardize how the park is referred to...you could call it "the park" in the body of the article, but not too often. Other possibilities is to simply call it "Glacier" or "Glacier NP" to shorten, but you should pick one or the other to standardize. I'm not a reviewer so just consider my suggestions to be ones you can adopt or ignore as you choose.-- MONGO 16:05, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
"The park has 131 glaciers over 0.05 square metres (0.54 sq ft) in size" That would be a largish ice cube! Surely something has been lost in translation here. Half a square foot of ice? I don't have the referenced article but this does not pass the basic credibility test. There is no way half a square foot constitutes a glacier. Chann94501 ( talk) 18:27, 27 November 2013 (UTC)