From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

References

This is an excellent article, but it needs references.-- RattBoy 10:00, 10 October 2006 (UTC) reply

If the river followed another path, wouldn't Rochester just have been founded at another spot? Weird comments at the end of this section... -- Jclingerman 4:16, 11 June 2010 (EST)

@Jclingerman: Most likely you are correct. If the river had remained in the original channel, there would have been a significant drop over the same limestone bedrocks. I suspect the falls and/or rapids would have been somewhere between Pittsford and Mendon, but any trace of a preglacier falls is buried under a lot of fill. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.187.162.53 ( talk) 05:55, 25 October 2010 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

References

This is an excellent article, but it needs references.-- RattBoy 10:00, 10 October 2006 (UTC) reply

If the river followed another path, wouldn't Rochester just have been founded at another spot? Weird comments at the end of this section... -- Jclingerman 4:16, 11 June 2010 (EST)

@Jclingerman: Most likely you are correct. If the river had remained in the original channel, there would have been a significant drop over the same limestone bedrocks. I suspect the falls and/or rapids would have been somewhere between Pittsford and Mendon, but any trace of a preglacier falls is buried under a lot of fill. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.187.162.53 ( talk) 05:55, 25 October 2010 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook