Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: maclean ( talk) 04:54, 29 October 2009 (UTC) reply

GA review (see Wikipedia:What is a good article?)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b ( MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Conclusion

This a very good article. I only have two items. First, I think the "noise rock" quote in the lead belongs in the "Styles" section, or at least a mentioning of "noise rock" or "punk rock" in that section. Second, did they give no reason for their split? -- maclean ( talk) 05:42, 29 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Thanks. (1) Done. (2) I have no idea or at least not one that has a reliable source. -- can dle • wicke 21:41, 29 October 2009 (UTC) reply