This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was deleted in July 2009 because of a lack of notability references, then restored later in the same month.
I think we could compile a fairly impressive list of projects that use gitorious. Off the top of my head: qt, pulseaudio, parts of gnome, etc.. Do you think that this would help meet notability guidelines? - JasonWoof ( talk) 23:08, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
Oh, also, are there any other notable installations of the gitorious codebase that would help? - JasonWoof ( talk) 23:11, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
I don't know enough about Wikipedia to trust myself editing the article, but would the fact that git-scm.com lists Gitorious [1] help? Dannytatom ( talk) 01:17, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Having improved the references, and Gitorious having itself become more notable since this article was deleted (KDE having announced it it is migrating to Gitorious), I've restored this article. If you have any objections, please discuss before deleting it (also please put a note on my talk page), either here or via AfD, rather than A7-ing it. Tuxcantfly ( talk) 22:38, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Today I noticed that http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Internet_services_supporting_OpenID was very short, and went to add Gitorious, but then saw that the categories (besides the Free Software stub) were commented out. Why is this? Should we publish them now that the article is published? JasonWoof ( talk) 20:58, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Thank you Greenrd for checking and restoring the categories! JasonWoof ( talk) 12:10, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Why did amarok/kde bail?
Should we say that they moved to gitorious and then moved off?
Are they running the gitorious code on their own server? (If not, do they plan to?)
Thanks, -- JasonWoof ( talk) 00:33, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
This is one of the three official repositories for entries in the MediaWiki Foundation's October 2011 Coding Challenge, along with GitHub and the MediaWiki site itself (see details at the contest FAQ). I think this counts as a way to establish notability of this site, in that its usefulness is acknowledged by another site that qualifies as notable; and I don't think any conflict-of-interest consideration applies here (because of Wikipedia's affiliation with MediaWiki). B7T ( talk) 13:06, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gitorious. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:29, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Gitorious. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:55, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Krinkle, I’m not sure your last change is correct. The popularity of Gitorious certainly wasn’t rising in 2016, so doesn’t seem appropriate. Speaking about the revert of my change, I do agree in a way, but in that case we should put the historic data for before Gitorious was acquired by GitLab, since in 2016 it already has been, and the rating is for the archived version, not the original website. -- Andrej Shadura ( talk) 16:28, 8 June 2018 (UTC).
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was deleted in July 2009 because of a lack of notability references, then restored later in the same month.
I think we could compile a fairly impressive list of projects that use gitorious. Off the top of my head: qt, pulseaudio, parts of gnome, etc.. Do you think that this would help meet notability guidelines? - JasonWoof ( talk) 23:08, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
Oh, also, are there any other notable installations of the gitorious codebase that would help? - JasonWoof ( talk) 23:11, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
I don't know enough about Wikipedia to trust myself editing the article, but would the fact that git-scm.com lists Gitorious [1] help? Dannytatom ( talk) 01:17, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Having improved the references, and Gitorious having itself become more notable since this article was deleted (KDE having announced it it is migrating to Gitorious), I've restored this article. If you have any objections, please discuss before deleting it (also please put a note on my talk page), either here or via AfD, rather than A7-ing it. Tuxcantfly ( talk) 22:38, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Today I noticed that http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Internet_services_supporting_OpenID was very short, and went to add Gitorious, but then saw that the categories (besides the Free Software stub) were commented out. Why is this? Should we publish them now that the article is published? JasonWoof ( talk) 20:58, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Thank you Greenrd for checking and restoring the categories! JasonWoof ( talk) 12:10, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Why did amarok/kde bail?
Should we say that they moved to gitorious and then moved off?
Are they running the gitorious code on their own server? (If not, do they plan to?)
Thanks, -- JasonWoof ( talk) 00:33, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
This is one of the three official repositories for entries in the MediaWiki Foundation's October 2011 Coding Challenge, along with GitHub and the MediaWiki site itself (see details at the contest FAQ). I think this counts as a way to establish notability of this site, in that its usefulness is acknowledged by another site that qualifies as notable; and I don't think any conflict-of-interest consideration applies here (because of Wikipedia's affiliation with MediaWiki). B7T ( talk) 13:06, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gitorious. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:29, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Gitorious. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:55, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Krinkle, I’m not sure your last change is correct. The popularity of Gitorious certainly wasn’t rising in 2016, so doesn’t seem appropriate. Speaking about the revert of my change, I do agree in a way, but in that case we should put the historic data for before Gitorious was acquired by GitLab, since in 2016 it already has been, and the rating is for the archived version, not the original website. -- Andrej Shadura ( talk) 16:28, 8 June 2018 (UTC).