From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (
|
visual edit |
history ) ·
Article talk (
|
history ) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
SCB '92 (
talk •
contribs •
count )
19:34, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see
WP:WIAGA for criteria
reply
Is it reasonably well written ?
A. Prose quality:
the only problem I have is the word "comrades" being used in the lead; it should be replaced with "friends" or "allies"
B.
MoS compliance for
lead ,
layout ,
words to watch ,
fiction , and
lists :
no problems here
Is it factually accurate and
verifiable ?
A.
References to sources :
well half the legacy section is uncited, where you're telling a plot of the sequel; but it is optional to cite a plot as it is referencing the work itself, so...
B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
no problems here
C.
No original research :
no problems here
Is it broad in its coverage ?
A. Major aspects:
no problems here
B. Focused:
no problems here
Is it
neutral ?
Fair representation without bias:
no problems here
Is it stable ?
No
edit wars , etc:
no problems here
Does it contain
images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
fair use rationales :
no problems here
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
suitable captions :
when listing the cast members in the caption, I'd put "and" before "Rocket"
Overall :
Pass or Fail:
this deserves to be a good article; good job