![]() | Gibson G-101 has been listed as one of the
Music good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 2, 2022. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
"The G-101 can also be heard on The B-52's song "Rock Lobster""
This is not right. It doesn't sound like a G101, it sounds 100% like a Farfisa Compact. The G101 and Farfisa Compact have some optical similarities, this may be the cause for the confusion.
Here you can see that it's a Farfisa Compact (at 4:50 - 4:54) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-UqKRGW6_rw
I also don't think that the organ in Devo's "Whip it" is a G101 but the sound isn't very characteristical so it could come from many organs. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
77.1.92.15 (
talk) 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gibson G-101. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:44, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Unexpectedlydian ( talk · contribs) 18:35, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm happy to start reviewing this article. I'll use the table below. Comments will appear soon!
Unexpectedlydian♯4
talk‽
18:35, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
Lead
Production
Features
Sound
|
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
Lead sections
Layout
Words to watch
List incorporation
Fiction
|
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
|
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
Lenhoff & Robertson, 2019
Combo Organ Heaven
G-101 Gibson Portable Organ Service Manual
Vail & Carson, 2000
|
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. |
|
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. |
|
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. |
|
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). |
|
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. |
|
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. |
|
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
|
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. |
|
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. |
|
All other issues I've addressed by directly copyediting the article so the problem no longer exists, or I have simply agreed with the assessment and made the recommended changes. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:38, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
I think those are all the points addressed now. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:24, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
![]() | Gibson G-101 has been listed as one of the
Music good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 2, 2022. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
"The G-101 can also be heard on The B-52's song "Rock Lobster""
This is not right. It doesn't sound like a G101, it sounds 100% like a Farfisa Compact. The G101 and Farfisa Compact have some optical similarities, this may be the cause for the confusion.
Here you can see that it's a Farfisa Compact (at 4:50 - 4:54) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-UqKRGW6_rw
I also don't think that the organ in Devo's "Whip it" is a G101 but the sound isn't very characteristical so it could come from many organs. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
77.1.92.15 (
talk) 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gibson G-101. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:44, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Unexpectedlydian ( talk · contribs) 18:35, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm happy to start reviewing this article. I'll use the table below. Comments will appear soon!
Unexpectedlydian♯4
talk‽
18:35, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
Lead
Production
Features
Sound
|
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
Lead sections
Layout
Words to watch
List incorporation
Fiction
|
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
|
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
Lenhoff & Robertson, 2019
Combo Organ Heaven
G-101 Gibson Portable Organ Service Manual
Vail & Carson, 2000
|
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. |
|
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. |
|
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. |
|
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). |
|
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. |
|
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. |
|
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
|
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. |
|
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. |
|
All other issues I've addressed by directly copyediting the article so the problem no longer exists, or I have simply agreed with the assessment and made the recommended changes. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:38, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
I think those are all the points addressed now. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:24, 2 July 2022 (UTC)