This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A banned user had made the following edit:
However the specimen was not properly examined until almost fifty years after it was found. Later anthropologists such as William Johnson Sollas, Wynfrid Duckworth, Marcellin Boule and Arthur Keith all examined the specimen. It has been shown that the specimen is similar to other western European Neanderthals. [1]
While the editor is banned, this particular edit seems fine to me. Can it be reinstated without provoking some sort of reaction from the patrollers? Petter Bøckman ( talk) 12:46, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
References
Something wrong with the embedding? I doesn't work on my end. Petter Bøckman ( talk) 14:07, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gibraltar 1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:47, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A banned user had made the following edit:
However the specimen was not properly examined until almost fifty years after it was found. Later anthropologists such as William Johnson Sollas, Wynfrid Duckworth, Marcellin Boule and Arthur Keith all examined the specimen. It has been shown that the specimen is similar to other western European Neanderthals. [1]
While the editor is banned, this particular edit seems fine to me. Can it be reinstated without provoking some sort of reaction from the patrollers? Petter Bøckman ( talk) 12:46, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
References
Something wrong with the embedding? I doesn't work on my end. Petter Bøckman ( talk) 14:07, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gibraltar 1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:47, 16 October 2017 (UTC)