Hello. I'll be reviewing this article and search for possible issues before passing to GA.
First of all, the lead section is too small. See
Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section where it recommends splitting content. I would suggest also adding details to avoid short paragraphs.
Well.. I know the leading zeros are part of how the book is actually presented and faithfulness to the chapter title is being followed here. As for the all caps - I think it is pretty annoying and unusual, but this was a big issue with Ryulong - I know he's gone, but I'd rather third opinions form on that content matter because I don't have the time or energy to deal with something a year from now about this.
ChrisGualtieri (
talk) 04:12, 12 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Now it's a bit better but it is a small lead where I don't know what to split. If you are still busy, should I fail the review and wait for the next time? Regards.
Tintor2 (
talk) 15:31, 12 April 2015 (UTC)reply
I am failing this review due to issues. Hopefully, it will be renominated without any of them.
Tintor2 (
talk) 01:34, 14 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Takes months to get a review, happens on vacation and now I'll have to wait months more for a simple thing which can take me an hour to rewrite - tops. Whatever... I nominated this for the anniversary and it took two months to get a review.... and I do not have the time to play these games.
ChrisGualtieri (
talk) 04:00, 15 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Hello. I'll be reviewing this article and search for possible issues before passing to GA.
First of all, the lead section is too small. See
Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section where it recommends splitting content. I would suggest also adding details to avoid short paragraphs.
Well.. I know the leading zeros are part of how the book is actually presented and faithfulness to the chapter title is being followed here. As for the all caps - I think it is pretty annoying and unusual, but this was a big issue with Ryulong - I know he's gone, but I'd rather third opinions form on that content matter because I don't have the time or energy to deal with something a year from now about this.
ChrisGualtieri (
talk) 04:12, 12 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Now it's a bit better but it is a small lead where I don't know what to split. If you are still busy, should I fail the review and wait for the next time? Regards.
Tintor2 (
talk) 15:31, 12 April 2015 (UTC)reply
I am failing this review due to issues. Hopefully, it will be renominated without any of them.
Tintor2 (
talk) 01:34, 14 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Takes months to get a review, happens on vacation and now I'll have to wait months more for a simple thing which can take me an hour to rewrite - tops. Whatever... I nominated this for the anniversary and it took two months to get a review.... and I do not have the time to play these games.
ChrisGualtieri (
talk) 04:00, 15 April 2015 (UTC)reply