This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Romania-
related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
The issue has been discussed even recently. There are no criteria for notability of rivers. It is not possible to restart the discussion every fortnight.
Afil (
talk)
20:49, 25 January 2008 (UTC)reply
I'll support a formal deletion move. If the primary author, Afil in this case, is unwilling to follow any of the suggestions from the prod template he removed, then this nearly empty, worthless article deserves to be deleted.
Gene Nygaard (
talk)
01:08, 7 February 2008 (UTC)reply
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Romania-
related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
The issue has been discussed even recently. There are no criteria for notability of rivers. It is not possible to restart the discussion every fortnight.
Afil (
talk)
20:49, 25 January 2008 (UTC)reply
I'll support a formal deletion move. If the primary author, Afil in this case, is unwilling to follow any of the suggestions from the prod template he removed, then this nearly empty, worthless article deserves to be deleted.
Gene Nygaard (
talk)
01:08, 7 February 2008 (UTC)reply