Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: harej 19:15, 17 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Is it reasonably well written?

A. Prose quality: Clear and understandable. I am not sure what was meant by "Semantic Web supply," but the source did not mention it so I removed the phrase.

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: Article is logically organized.

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

A. References to sources: Yes

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: Yes, but citations to print sources should include page numbers. Also, "Getty Research Institute. Records, 1991-1999." is an unclear citation.

C. No original research: No original research.

Is it broad in its coverage?

A. Major aspects: The article serves as a sufficient summary of the Institute, including its history and activities.

B. Focused: The article is sufficiently detailed.

Is it neutral?

Fair representation without bias: Yes

Is it stable?

No edit wars, etc: Very stable.

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: N/A

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: The article could use more images, such as the logo, pictures of relevant people, or photographs of their facilities, but I am not sure that such pictures are available.

Overall:

Pass or Fail:

harej 19:37, 17 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Thank you for conducting the review. I have added a photo of the exterior of the GRI Headquarters Building. Racepacket ( talk) 21:22, 17 June 2011 (UTC) reply

I have added page numbers to the extent that I could locate them, and clarified the citation to ""Getty Research Institute. Records, 1991-1999." which is an online library catalog entry explaining how GII programs were folded into GRI. Thanks, Racepacket ( talk) 10:01, 18 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Article passed. hare j 19:03, 18 June 2011 (UTC) reply