Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Hi, I'll be reviewing this article. The rules for GA reviews are stated at Good Article criteria. Feel free to respond to my comments under each one, and please sign each response, so that it's clear who said what.
When an issue is resolved, I'll mark it with Done. If I think an issue remains unresolved after responses / changes by the editor(s), I'll mark it
Not done. Occasionally I decide one of my comments is off-target, and
strike it out --
Aaroncrick (
talk)
22:34, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Very nice article. Looks good just through reading it on the screen. I have a couple of minor things on paper I will fix when I find it but nothing stopping from becoming a GA. Good job. Aaroncrick ( talk) 06:43, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Hi, I'll be reviewing this article. The rules for GA reviews are stated at Good Article criteria. Feel free to respond to my comments under each one, and please sign each response, so that it's clear who said what.
When an issue is resolved, I'll mark it with Done. If I think an issue remains unresolved after responses / changes by the editor(s), I'll mark it
Not done. Occasionally I decide one of my comments is off-target, and
strike it out --
Aaroncrick (
talk)
22:34, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Very nice article. Looks good just through reading it on the screen. I have a couple of minor things on paper I will fix when I find it but nothing stopping from becoming a GA. Good job. Aaroncrick ( talk) 06:43, 22 September 2009 (UTC)