GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: FeuDeJoie 22:34, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Well written. No obvious problems, a few minor issues.
Article is generally well written;
Introduction
Background
Composition
Critical reception
Chart performance
Critical reception
Generally well-written aside from what I have stated. I am placing this article on hold for seven days in which the nominator can message me with any queries and can fix the problems listed or otherwise contest and debate them with me for a final conclusion. FeuDeJoie
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: FeuDeJoie 22:34, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Well written. No obvious problems, a few minor issues.
Article is generally well written;
Introduction
Background
Composition
Critical reception
Chart performance
Critical reception
Generally well-written aside from what I have stated. I am placing this article on hold for seven days in which the nominator can message me with any queries and can fix the problems listed or otherwise contest and debate them with me for a final conclusion. FeuDeJoie