This article is written in
British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
A fact from German submarine U-1018 appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 March 2009, and was viewed approximately 4,306 times (
disclaimer) (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all
Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please
join the project, or contribute to the
project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This said U1018 attacked BTC 81 in company of U-327 and both were destroyed. There's no source for this, and it isn't mentioned for U-327 at Uboatnet, or in Blair, or Kemp, or Neistle (Niestle queries whether U-327 was even in the area, having been posted missing on 13 Feb, and may have been destroyed as early as 3 Feb; he suggests the second attack that day was on U-1208); Also, Wemyss describes both attacks and AFAIR they weren't linked. So I've taken it out altogether, rather than asking for citations.
Xyl 54 (
talk) 04:55, 27 October 2009 (UTC)reply
This article is written in
British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
A fact from German submarine U-1018 appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 March 2009, and was viewed approximately 4,306 times (
disclaimer) (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all
Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please
join the project, or contribute to the
project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This said U1018 attacked BTC 81 in company of U-327 and both were destroyed. There's no source for this, and it isn't mentioned for U-327 at Uboatnet, or in Blair, or Kemp, or Neistle (Niestle queries whether U-327 was even in the area, having been posted missing on 13 Feb, and may have been destroyed as early as 3 Feb; he suggests the second attack that day was on U-1208); Also, Wemyss describes both attacks and AFAIR they weren't linked. So I've taken it out altogether, rather than asking for citations.
Xyl 54 (
talk) 04:55, 27 October 2009 (UTC)reply