Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk · contribs) 00:46, 8 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Will take this one. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 00:46, 8 November 2017 (UTC) reply

• Lead and infobox;
  • Lead needs expansion
  • Link "full load" in infobox
  •  Done
• Section 1;
  • Please mention who placed the order
  •  Done
  • The second sentence is not clear; which is to be armed with twin turrets and was designed for long range; the Z32 or Type 1936 and 1936A ship?
  •  Done
  • 127mm (5 in) guns; use conversion template
  •  Done
  • on that day; on which day?
  •  Done
  • Abbreviate units from their second mention
  •  Done
• Section 2;
  • After commissioning and work up; what do you mean by "work up"

    I've expanded the Wiktionary page and linked it. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 14:35, 15 November 2017 (UTC) reply

--Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 10:39, 15 November 2017 (UTC) reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a ( reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR): d ( copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a ( major aspects): b ( focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b ( appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 09:37, 17 November 2017 (UTC) reply