From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on German and Allied aircraft losses during Operation Bodenplatte. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{ cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{ nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 15:07, 25 February 2016 (UTC) reply

aircraft losses

Where in this poorly written article can I find the bottom line losses without wading though a lot of tripe. 2.121.174.214 ( talk) 00:56, 25 December 2016 (UTC) reply

It's absolutely unclear what the summary is. The article title talks about German and Allied aircraft losses. So, how many aircraft were lost by each side? Pranab ( talk) 09:06, 1 January 2022 (UTC) reply

A curious link

The link Baseplate appears to be rather curious in this context. Peter Horn User talk 01:30, 29 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Background section

The whole Background section is pretty much incoherent. It is also so poorly written it is impossible to follow and draws conclusions not establish the background. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.86.117.208 ( talk) 14:06, 7 March 2018 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on German and Allied aircraft losses during Operation Bodenplatte. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{ cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{ nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 15:07, 25 February 2016 (UTC) reply

aircraft losses

Where in this poorly written article can I find the bottom line losses without wading though a lot of tripe. 2.121.174.214 ( talk) 00:56, 25 December 2016 (UTC) reply

It's absolutely unclear what the summary is. The article title talks about German and Allied aircraft losses. So, how many aircraft were lost by each side? Pranab ( talk) 09:06, 1 January 2022 (UTC) reply

A curious link

The link Baseplate appears to be rather curious in this context. Peter Horn User talk 01:30, 29 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Background section

The whole Background section is pretty much incoherent. It is also so poorly written it is impossible to follow and draws conclusions not establish the background. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.86.117.208 ( talk) 14:06, 7 March 2018 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook