This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Royalty and Nobility This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Low-importance). Middle Ages Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The contents of the Gérard I, Count of Looz page were merged into Gerard, Count of Loon on 1 August 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

Please try to stick to one standard spelling system. For example Loon or Looz, in all articles. I see the variations are creating problems for the links. For common alternative spellings, try to create redirect articles so that readers will get to the right article even if they use other spellings.-- Andrew Lancaster ( talk) 12:17, 23 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Should we remove the "II" from the name? I think this is based on a theory of an earlier Gerard which not everyone agrees with? Does it create confusion to remove it?-- Andrew Lancaster ( talk) 13:10, 23 June 2017 (UTC) reply

I think that the article Gérard I, Count of Looz, being only about an historical error, should be merged into this article as a new section. The article only exists on WP because of that error, which is still around, though long ago disproven.-- Andrew Lancaster ( talk) 23:19, 18 December 2019 (UTC) reply

  Y  Merger complete. Klbrain ( talk) 12:22, 1 August 2020 (UTC) reply