![]() | Gerald Willis (politician) has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: May 11, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Gerald Willis (politician) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 29 March 2024 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
The result was: promoted by
Bruxton
talk
17:43, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
5x expanded by Jon698 ( talk). Self-nominated at 03:32, 22 February 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Gerald Willis (politician); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
The article is excellent, please consider submitting it for GA.
GRuban (
talk)
05:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
References
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Jon698 ( talk · contribs) 17:57, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Samoht27 ( talk · contribs) 16:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Overall, prose is very clear and understandable, not really any notes. One line that could be changed is the following, "Willis defeated Jerry Smith, mayor pro tem of Jacksonville,". I think possibly changing "mayor pro tem" to deputy mayor would be more fitting and clear to most readers. The article complies with the manual of style.
In conclusion, the article passes the criteria for prose and writing.
The article does contain a list of all references, and the references appear to be of good quality. The article doesn't contain information not presented in any references, not going against our policy on original research. Almost all references are cited inline, however there are a few that are not. These are marked in a "Works Cited" section. These references, if possible, should be inline citations.
In conclusion, information presented in the article is verifiable, and the article contains no original research. Unfortunately, some sources are not cited inline, which makes me not entirely sure. However, I still lean towards the article passing the criteria for verifiability.
The sources I checked for Verifiability include the following,
All sources I checked were verifiable.
The article covers all the important points about the subject, and stays within the scope of the subject. Main points are addressed in the lead, staying in line with the manual of style.
In conclusion, the article passes the criteria for coverage of the topic.
This article is in line with the policies of maintaining a neutral point of view and doesn't reflect any bias possessed by contributors to the article. Easily passes this criteria.
The article easily passes this criteria, the subject of the article is a deceased and relatively uncontroversial politician who wasn't a particularly major figure outside of his home state.
This one's difficult. The lead image in the infobox should be enough, however I am not entirely sure of its copyright status. I can't find anything to suggest it CAN'T be used, however there's a very good chance it is not exactly public domain. The image was published in a newspaper, meaning its content is USUALLY not public domain outright. Since the newspaper the image was clipped for use on Newspapers.com, I would assume the use of the image here is used correctly. This one is super ambiguous though, so I cannot be 100% certain it passes this criteria.
![]() | Gerald Willis (politician) has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: May 11, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Gerald Willis (politician) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 29 March 2024 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
The result was: promoted by
Bruxton
talk
17:43, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
5x expanded by Jon698 ( talk). Self-nominated at 03:32, 22 February 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Gerald Willis (politician); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
The article is excellent, please consider submitting it for GA.
GRuban (
talk)
05:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
References
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Jon698 ( talk · contribs) 17:57, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Samoht27 ( talk · contribs) 16:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Overall, prose is very clear and understandable, not really any notes. One line that could be changed is the following, "Willis defeated Jerry Smith, mayor pro tem of Jacksonville,". I think possibly changing "mayor pro tem" to deputy mayor would be more fitting and clear to most readers. The article complies with the manual of style.
In conclusion, the article passes the criteria for prose and writing.
The article does contain a list of all references, and the references appear to be of good quality. The article doesn't contain information not presented in any references, not going against our policy on original research. Almost all references are cited inline, however there are a few that are not. These are marked in a "Works Cited" section. These references, if possible, should be inline citations.
In conclusion, information presented in the article is verifiable, and the article contains no original research. Unfortunately, some sources are not cited inline, which makes me not entirely sure. However, I still lean towards the article passing the criteria for verifiability.
The sources I checked for Verifiability include the following,
All sources I checked were verifiable.
The article covers all the important points about the subject, and stays within the scope of the subject. Main points are addressed in the lead, staying in line with the manual of style.
In conclusion, the article passes the criteria for coverage of the topic.
This article is in line with the policies of maintaining a neutral point of view and doesn't reflect any bias possessed by contributors to the article. Easily passes this criteria.
The article easily passes this criteria, the subject of the article is a deceased and relatively uncontroversial politician who wasn't a particularly major figure outside of his home state.
This one's difficult. The lead image in the infobox should be enough, however I am not entirely sure of its copyright status. I can't find anything to suggest it CAN'T be used, however there's a very good chance it is not exactly public domain. The image was published in a newspaper, meaning its content is USUALLY not public domain outright. Since the newspaper the image was clipped for use on Newspapers.com, I would assume the use of the image here is used correctly. This one is super ambiguous though, so I cannot be 100% certain it passes this criteria.