This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Apparently this article needs wikifying. According to the glossary, this means to add links to the text, which it already possesses, and to format it appropriately. I didn't think it was particularly out of line; I made a deliberate attempt to follow the general formatting used in other articles. Any ideas as to what's being referred to here? Be quite nice to avoid the same errors in the future. -- Tailkinker 08:28, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Should the automatic redirect from The Adversary (Fables) be removed? The identity of the Adversary is a major spoiler, and the automatic redirect leads to two problems: (1) clicking on the Adversary's link inevitably spoils the Adversary's identity, and (2) users cannot be warned that they are going to be spoiled before clicking on the link.
I propose removing the redirect, putting some basic non-spoiler information about the Adversary on the new page, and putting a link to this page between spoiler warnings and without the character's name in the link text.
I realize I'm new to Wikipedia and this problem has probably been addressed before, but I can't think off the top of my head of an equivalent problem to check what's been done already. Thoughts? Kate Nepveu 00:20, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Is there confirmation for Peter Pan as the original Adversary? I had always heard that that was either an untrue rumor or deliberate misinformation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.218.221.152 ( talk) 06:40, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
the explanation of why he changed the character to gepetto seems stupid to me peter pan is very well known in britain as a brit i remember reading peterpan in school and watching the film as a youth 86.13.204.247 ( talk) 13:28, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
makes sense, but wouldnt it be clearer just to say that peter pan was copyrighted so they were unable to use him 86.30.108.115 ( talk) 00:45, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject. If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class. The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject. Comics-awb ( talk) 16:36, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Considering the recent events of issues #73-75, Gepetto's page sorely needs updating, with the results of the war as well as Gepetto's own status included. DestradoZero 01:08, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T 14:09, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia needs an article section (or a whole article) on the literal "puppet Adversary"-- the one made of wood. While avoiding spoilers would be ideal, Wikipedia's purpose takes precidence over any desire to avoid spoilers, be Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not censored. Besides, anyone reading about Fables (comics) on Wikipedia has to know they risk seeing spoilers. tahc chat 21:45, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Apparently this article needs wikifying. According to the glossary, this means to add links to the text, which it already possesses, and to format it appropriately. I didn't think it was particularly out of line; I made a deliberate attempt to follow the general formatting used in other articles. Any ideas as to what's being referred to here? Be quite nice to avoid the same errors in the future. -- Tailkinker 08:28, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Should the automatic redirect from The Adversary (Fables) be removed? The identity of the Adversary is a major spoiler, and the automatic redirect leads to two problems: (1) clicking on the Adversary's link inevitably spoils the Adversary's identity, and (2) users cannot be warned that they are going to be spoiled before clicking on the link.
I propose removing the redirect, putting some basic non-spoiler information about the Adversary on the new page, and putting a link to this page between spoiler warnings and without the character's name in the link text.
I realize I'm new to Wikipedia and this problem has probably been addressed before, but I can't think off the top of my head of an equivalent problem to check what's been done already. Thoughts? Kate Nepveu 00:20, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Is there confirmation for Peter Pan as the original Adversary? I had always heard that that was either an untrue rumor or deliberate misinformation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.218.221.152 ( talk) 06:40, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
the explanation of why he changed the character to gepetto seems stupid to me peter pan is very well known in britain as a brit i remember reading peterpan in school and watching the film as a youth 86.13.204.247 ( talk) 13:28, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
makes sense, but wouldnt it be clearer just to say that peter pan was copyrighted so they were unable to use him 86.30.108.115 ( talk) 00:45, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject. If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class. The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject. Comics-awb ( talk) 16:36, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Considering the recent events of issues #73-75, Gepetto's page sorely needs updating, with the results of the war as well as Gepetto's own status included. DestradoZero 01:08, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T 14:09, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia needs an article section (or a whole article) on the literal "puppet Adversary"-- the one made of wood. While avoiding spoilers would be ideal, Wikipedia's purpose takes precidence over any desire to avoid spoilers, be Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not censored. Besides, anyone reading about Fables (comics) on Wikipedia has to know they risk seeing spoilers. tahc chat 21:45, 8 August 2012 (UTC)