This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
All of the references cited are dead links, except for #3. - Ellen ( talk) 22:24, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
How notable is this person, really? Is there anything that makes him notable - as being related to a famous person doesn't do it? Please see WP:BIO before replying... Jobjörn ( Talk ° contribs) 16:42, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Here's why (copied from User talk:W.marsh):
Hello! In your closing of the AfD on George Randolph Hearst III, you confused me. In closing the debate, you state the result was "keep". When you a few seconds later edit the talk page, you state the result was "no consensus". What's up with that? (I'd rather see it as "no consensus" as then I have some basis for re-nominating it in a few months or so - but if it's a keep I don't think I'll bother.) Jobjörn ( Talk ° contribs) 22:00, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
For details on the genealogical fraud that was attempted, how it is disproven and the action GRH3 took to close down hearstmania.com see here Wjhonson 03:03, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
All of the references cited are dead links, except for #3. - Ellen ( talk) 22:24, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
How notable is this person, really? Is there anything that makes him notable - as being related to a famous person doesn't do it? Please see WP:BIO before replying... Jobjörn ( Talk ° contribs) 16:42, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Here's why (copied from User talk:W.marsh):
Hello! In your closing of the AfD on George Randolph Hearst III, you confused me. In closing the debate, you state the result was "keep". When you a few seconds later edit the talk page, you state the result was "no consensus". What's up with that? (I'd rather see it as "no consensus" as then I have some basis for re-nominating it in a few months or so - but if it's a keep I don't think I'll bother.) Jobjörn ( Talk ° contribs) 22:00, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
For details on the genealogical fraud that was attempted, how it is disproven and the action GRH3 took to close down hearstmania.com see here Wjhonson 03:03, 5 February 2007 (UTC)