George Insole has been listed as one of the
History good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 3, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was created or improved during the " The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help! |
A fact from George Insole appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 26 April 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Nice job. Just a few notes:
Hope that helps. I've learned some new things today. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 23:55, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
I noticed you removed the URL access dates in book citations with URLs but not in journal citations with URLs. Is there a style-guide that covers this? RLO1729 ( talk) 02:56, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
I assessed this as C-class to get the ball rolling, as it was previously Unassessed even though a candidate for Good Article status. May I suggest someone uses the B-class criteria to check if it could be promoted to B as the next step? It certainly seems to be a worthy article, but I am not experienced in detailed assessments. welsh ( talk) 22:39, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: CaroleHenson ( talk · contribs) 18:25, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Looks good.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 18:35, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
No comments.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 19:05, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Yes, it is well written, absolutely concise, and clear.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 19:14, 2 April 2020 (UTC) | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | Yes, it complies with the MOS.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 19:14, 2 April 2020 (UTC) | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Yes, the sources are verifiable, but it is a little difficult because there are sometimes five and six citations used for the cited content.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 19:14, 2 April 2020 (UTC) | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Great sources. Please look at the years in citations 14 and 16, I think there is a typo (or you are a time-traveller). | |
2c. it contains no original research. | There is no evidence of original research. | |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | From spot-checking books and the copyvio detector, there is no evidence of copyright violations.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 22:39, 2 April 2020 (UTC) | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | The article covers the main aspects of Insole's life.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 19:14, 2 April 2020 (UTC) | |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | Absolutely no unnecessary detail.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 19:14, 2 April 2020 (UTC) | |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | Yes, the article is neutral.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 19:14, 2 April 2020 (UTC) | |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Yes, the article is stable.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 19:14, 2 April 2020 (UTC) | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Yes, the images are properly tagged.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 19:17, 2 April 2020 (UTC) | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Yes, the images are relevant to the article content.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 19:17, 2 April 2020 (UTC) | |
7. Overall assessment. |
Great job!
Please take a look at the years for citations 14 and 16.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 19:21, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk)
22:17, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by RLO1729 ( talk). Self-nominated at 03:58, 6 April 2020 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
I hope the above and the minor edits I made will be helpful. -- 84.64.237.205 ( talk) 14:35, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
George Insole has been listed as one of the
History good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 3, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was created or improved during the " The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help! |
A fact from George Insole appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 26 April 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Nice job. Just a few notes:
Hope that helps. I've learned some new things today. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 23:55, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
I noticed you removed the URL access dates in book citations with URLs but not in journal citations with URLs. Is there a style-guide that covers this? RLO1729 ( talk) 02:56, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
I assessed this as C-class to get the ball rolling, as it was previously Unassessed even though a candidate for Good Article status. May I suggest someone uses the B-class criteria to check if it could be promoted to B as the next step? It certainly seems to be a worthy article, but I am not experienced in detailed assessments. welsh ( talk) 22:39, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: CaroleHenson ( talk · contribs) 18:25, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Looks good.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 18:35, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
No comments.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 19:05, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Yes, it is well written, absolutely concise, and clear.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 19:14, 2 April 2020 (UTC) | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | Yes, it complies with the MOS.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 19:14, 2 April 2020 (UTC) | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Yes, the sources are verifiable, but it is a little difficult because there are sometimes five and six citations used for the cited content.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 19:14, 2 April 2020 (UTC) | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Great sources. Please look at the years in citations 14 and 16, I think there is a typo (or you are a time-traveller). | |
2c. it contains no original research. | There is no evidence of original research. | |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | From spot-checking books and the copyvio detector, there is no evidence of copyright violations.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 22:39, 2 April 2020 (UTC) | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | The article covers the main aspects of Insole's life.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 19:14, 2 April 2020 (UTC) | |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | Absolutely no unnecessary detail.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 19:14, 2 April 2020 (UTC) | |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | Yes, the article is neutral.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 19:14, 2 April 2020 (UTC) | |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Yes, the article is stable.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 19:14, 2 April 2020 (UTC) | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Yes, the images are properly tagged.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 19:17, 2 April 2020 (UTC) | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Yes, the images are relevant to the article content.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 19:17, 2 April 2020 (UTC) | |
7. Overall assessment. |
Great job!
Please take a look at the years for citations 14 and 16.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 19:21, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk)
22:17, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by RLO1729 ( talk). Self-nominated at 03:58, 6 April 2020 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
I hope the above and the minor edits I made will be helpful. -- 84.64.237.205 ( talk) 14:35, 1 July 2020 (UTC)