This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Anthroponymy High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthroponymyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthroponymyTemplate:WikiProject AnthroponymyAnthroponymy articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rather than list everyone named George, it might be simpler to link to http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Special%3AAllPages&from=George — Tamfang ( talk) 02:16, 21 November 2008 (UTC) reply

a) In principle, I agree - that's why I (only) added the disambig pages.

b) I agree - that's why it is already there.

(Have a look at George (given name)#See also - "{{lookfrom|George}}" displays as " All pages with titles beginning with George" and expands to " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PrefixIndex/George".)

Cheers, Pdfpdf ( talk) 04:25, 21 November 2008 (UTC) reply

I reverted the last edit under Wikipedia's vandalism policy Wikipedia:Vandalism thank you for wasting the few seconds it took to undo it. 75.107.35.18 ( talk) 01:33, 1 November 2010 (UTC) reply

I've come across a handful of instances of George as a female name, which isn't mentioned in the article at all at the moment.

Is this usually a short form of Georgina or similar, or a taking after such pseudonyms as George Eliot? Does anyone here have sufficient knowledge to write a bit about this? -- Smjg ( talk) 16:21, 11 November 2010 (UTC) reply

Seems in the Philippines just "George" is a typical female name: /info/en/?search=The_Hows_of_Us Balupton ( talk) 10:05, 7 April 2021 (UTC) reply