![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Gentoo/FreeBSD page were merged into Gentoo/Alt on 31 October 2014. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
![]() | This article was nominated for merging with Gentoo/Alt on 26 October 2014. The result of the discussion was Merge. |
Hi, in a recent edit summary I mentioned that Gentoo/FreeBSD is based on GNU. This was under the assumption that Gentoo/FreeBSD is a Gentoo's GNU/Linux distro with some FreeBSD parts stuck in: maybe just the FreeBSD kernel? maybe just the kernel and libc? Maybe the kernel, libc, and command line stuff? ...or maybe my assumption was completely wrong. Can someone who's better informed mention in the article the relationship to GNU and GNU/Linux? Thanks. Gronky 12:14, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
"The original, long term goal is to be able to choose any combination of software between the GNU/Linux and BSD versions, but that it is no more a priority as it is unfeasibly difficult at this point in time."
What does that mean? Should it actually be, "The original, long term goal was to be able to choose any combination of software between the GNU/Linux and BSD versions, but that it is no longer a priority, as it is not feasible at this point in time."? -- Charles Gaudette 04:11, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
it was actually the other way round, gentoo took it's portage system from freebsd after one of the lead developers used freebsd for a few months. - withnail420
This was tagged for some reason, though I haven't found any discussion of it on the talk page. Can the author who added this tag please clarify on how the article fails to meet notability guideline? It could use more references, but is otherwise just as significant as any other Linux / BSD project article. 68.209.235.149 16:13, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
I propose to remove the citation needed since I (as actual Gentoo/Alt lead and Gentoo/FreeBSD deputy lead) certify that the sentence is true Drizztbsd 12:46, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
I propose that Gentoo/FreeBSD be merged into Gentoo/Alt. There is not really that much text in this article, so it would be quite easy to put into the section Gentoo/Alt#Gentoo.2FFreeBSD. Also, I'm not really sure that Gentoo/FreeBSD is notable enough for its own article, especially seeing as we already have an article on Gentoo/Alt. Orthogonal1 ( talk) 04:14, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Gentoo/FreeBSD page were merged into Gentoo/Alt on 31 October 2014. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
![]() | This article was nominated for merging with Gentoo/Alt on 26 October 2014. The result of the discussion was Merge. |
Hi, in a recent edit summary I mentioned that Gentoo/FreeBSD is based on GNU. This was under the assumption that Gentoo/FreeBSD is a Gentoo's GNU/Linux distro with some FreeBSD parts stuck in: maybe just the FreeBSD kernel? maybe just the kernel and libc? Maybe the kernel, libc, and command line stuff? ...or maybe my assumption was completely wrong. Can someone who's better informed mention in the article the relationship to GNU and GNU/Linux? Thanks. Gronky 12:14, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
"The original, long term goal is to be able to choose any combination of software between the GNU/Linux and BSD versions, but that it is no more a priority as it is unfeasibly difficult at this point in time."
What does that mean? Should it actually be, "The original, long term goal was to be able to choose any combination of software between the GNU/Linux and BSD versions, but that it is no longer a priority, as it is not feasible at this point in time."? -- Charles Gaudette 04:11, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
it was actually the other way round, gentoo took it's portage system from freebsd after one of the lead developers used freebsd for a few months. - withnail420
This was tagged for some reason, though I haven't found any discussion of it on the talk page. Can the author who added this tag please clarify on how the article fails to meet notability guideline? It could use more references, but is otherwise just as significant as any other Linux / BSD project article. 68.209.235.149 16:13, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
I propose to remove the citation needed since I (as actual Gentoo/Alt lead and Gentoo/FreeBSD deputy lead) certify that the sentence is true Drizztbsd 12:46, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
I propose that Gentoo/FreeBSD be merged into Gentoo/Alt. There is not really that much text in this article, so it would be quite easy to put into the section Gentoo/Alt#Gentoo.2FFreeBSD. Also, I'm not really sure that Gentoo/FreeBSD is notable enough for its own article, especially seeing as we already have an article on Gentoo/Alt. Orthogonal1 ( talk) 04:14, 26 October 2014 (UTC)