![]() | Geneviève Lhermitte has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013. Further details are available here. |
These appear to be the court documents officially charging Lhermitte with the murders: http://www.standaard.be/extra/pdf/lhermitte.pdf -- Katerwaul ( talk) 04:52, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
We're having trouble finding pictures of any kind that aren't copyrighted that we can put on this page. Anyone know of any possible pictures we could use? (of anything related to the page, as we have no media added yet) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kslinker5493 ( talk • contribs) 17:01, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
This is just a minor thing, but you might want to have the photo closer to the top of the page. It looks kind of awkward down at the bottom and a photo is supposed to be used at least partly as an attention getter. -- Mdcoope3 ( talk) 13:28, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
I've contacted Getty images and Reuters images about possibly using their photos. All the pictures I found on different news sites came from those two companies, so hopefully we will be granted permission soon. Kslinker5493 ( talk) 13:58, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
I was going through the upload wizard for that family picture, and I don't think we have a legitimate claim to fair use for it. If we do, that would mean hunting down more information than just the author of the picture, and I'm not certain we have time for that. -- Katerwaul ( talk) 16:18, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
Words to watch:
As per
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CLAIM#WP:CLAIM be careful when using words like "claim" because it calls their credibility of their statement into question --
MangoDango (
talk) 15:56, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
:::To represent both sides of that issue, I would suggest adding (if you can find any) his response to her claim.--
Tabbboooo (
talk) 18:29, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
It think that the information provided in this article is clear and that the sentences are well-written, but I think the style of prose and paragraph structure could be worked on. Even though there are no bulleted lists, the paragraph structure for almost the entire article has line breaks for one or two sentences. In the "paragraphs" section of the
Manual of Style for good criteria, it talks about paragraph structure and running prose.--
Eng395jy (
talk) 14:33, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Cwmhiraeth ( talk · contribs) 11:26, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the comments. These were actually helpful. I changed everything you suggested. My specific changes are marked in bold next to each point. Sections have fewer short paragraphs, more Wikilinks are included, etc. Please let us know if there is anything else we can change for the "Good Article" listing. -- Information-01152001 ( talk) 02:39, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
I'm proposing to merge Lhermitte case into this article because this has much more detail, plus English-language sources. Only the ECHR claim discussed on Lhermitte case is missing from here. Mortee ( talk) 17:45, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
![]() | Geneviève Lhermitte has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013. Further details are available here. |
These appear to be the court documents officially charging Lhermitte with the murders: http://www.standaard.be/extra/pdf/lhermitte.pdf -- Katerwaul ( talk) 04:52, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
We're having trouble finding pictures of any kind that aren't copyrighted that we can put on this page. Anyone know of any possible pictures we could use? (of anything related to the page, as we have no media added yet) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kslinker5493 ( talk • contribs) 17:01, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
This is just a minor thing, but you might want to have the photo closer to the top of the page. It looks kind of awkward down at the bottom and a photo is supposed to be used at least partly as an attention getter. -- Mdcoope3 ( talk) 13:28, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
I've contacted Getty images and Reuters images about possibly using their photos. All the pictures I found on different news sites came from those two companies, so hopefully we will be granted permission soon. Kslinker5493 ( talk) 13:58, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
I was going through the upload wizard for that family picture, and I don't think we have a legitimate claim to fair use for it. If we do, that would mean hunting down more information than just the author of the picture, and I'm not certain we have time for that. -- Katerwaul ( talk) 16:18, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
Words to watch:
As per
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CLAIM#WP:CLAIM be careful when using words like "claim" because it calls their credibility of their statement into question --
MangoDango (
talk) 15:56, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
:::To represent both sides of that issue, I would suggest adding (if you can find any) his response to her claim.--
Tabbboooo (
talk) 18:29, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
It think that the information provided in this article is clear and that the sentences are well-written, but I think the style of prose and paragraph structure could be worked on. Even though there are no bulleted lists, the paragraph structure for almost the entire article has line breaks for one or two sentences. In the "paragraphs" section of the
Manual of Style for good criteria, it talks about paragraph structure and running prose.--
Eng395jy (
talk) 14:33, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Cwmhiraeth ( talk · contribs) 11:26, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the comments. These were actually helpful. I changed everything you suggested. My specific changes are marked in bold next to each point. Sections have fewer short paragraphs, more Wikilinks are included, etc. Please let us know if there is anything else we can change for the "Good Article" listing. -- Information-01152001 ( talk) 02:39, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
I'm proposing to merge Lhermitte case into this article because this has much more detail, plus English-language sources. Only the ECHR claim discussed on Lhermitte case is missing from here. Mortee ( talk) 17:45, 17 March 2017 (UTC)