This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Judaism High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Bible High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Religious texts ( defunct) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts articles

This page is a 100% rip off from the Jewish Encyclopedia:

http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/3056-bereshit-rabbah — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.132.8.222 ( talk) 09:11, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply

This is now stated explicitly in the article. -- FeralOink ( talk) 09:53, 16 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Beginning of the "Form" section, is "proem" just a mistake, or some scholarly Hebrew term I don't know? IAmNitpicking ( talk) 16:29, 12 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Proem means "preface," but you're right to ask why not say so intelligibly. I made the change in the article. -- Dauster ( talk) 02:13, 13 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Moved from Wikipedia talk:Talk page guidelines. Johnuniq ( talk) 02:20, 4 September 2016 (UTC) reply

the text contains "haggadic" three times (at least) ... should it not be "aggadic"? Silvermana ( talk) 20:06, 3 September 2016 (UTC) reply