![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
The most commonly-used method of model selection is via AIC. It has been tricky, though, to use AIC with GLMMs. The recent paper by Saefken et al. gives a practical method for working with AIC. Thus, Saefken et al. advance our abilities to select the best GLMM. For more details, see the paper (it is free online, via the doi). 31.55.87.180 ( talk) 17:27, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
I think this article is worth expanding. This DRAFT r-sig-mixed-models FAQ has a lot of information and many useful references. Tayste ( edits) 21:09, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
This article previously had separate sections for Notes and References. That was changed: now there is just References. The change makes it impossible to cite different pages (in different notes) within the same book. For an example of how to do such citation, see e.g. the article Akaike information criterion. The individual notes can be set up so that they link to the References (as in the AIC article). I believe that it would be better to have this article use the same style of Notes & References as the AIC article. SolidPhase ( talk) 09:47, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
I have noticed that the article provides no explanation to what the Phi and Theta symbols mean in the equations. As someone unfamiliar with these models, I could only find Theta in the article about generalized linear models for parameterization, but not Phi. -- 2A02:8109:9EC0:180A:F02E:A404:EDFA:37B0 ( talk) 20:13, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
The most commonly-used method of model selection is via AIC. It has been tricky, though, to use AIC with GLMMs. The recent paper by Saefken et al. gives a practical method for working with AIC. Thus, Saefken et al. advance our abilities to select the best GLMM. For more details, see the paper (it is free online, via the doi). 31.55.87.180 ( talk) 17:27, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
I think this article is worth expanding. This DRAFT r-sig-mixed-models FAQ has a lot of information and many useful references. Tayste ( edits) 21:09, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
This article previously had separate sections for Notes and References. That was changed: now there is just References. The change makes it impossible to cite different pages (in different notes) within the same book. For an example of how to do such citation, see e.g. the article Akaike information criterion. The individual notes can be set up so that they link to the References (as in the AIC article). I believe that it would be better to have this article use the same style of Notes & References as the AIC article. SolidPhase ( talk) 09:47, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
I have noticed that the article provides no explanation to what the Phi and Theta symbols mean in the equations. As someone unfamiliar with these models, I could only find Theta in the article about generalized linear models for parameterization, but not Phi. -- 2A02:8109:9EC0:180A:F02E:A404:EDFA:37B0 ( talk) 20:13, 26 July 2020 (UTC)